The difference between a professional options trader and a broke trader isn't strategy—it's risk management.
Two traders, same strategy, same market conditions. Trader A compounds 30% annually for a decade. Trader B blows up after a bad 6 weeks.
The only difference? Trader A sized positions to survive drawdowns. Trader B bet the farm on every trade.
In this guide, you'll learn the exact position-sizing frameworks, portfolio Greeks management, and loss-control mechanisms that separate sustainable income traders from blown-up accounts.
The First Principle: Never Risk More Than You Can Afford to Lose
This isn't cliché advice—it's foundational math.
Define your account risk tolerance first.
You have an account with $50,000. How much can you afford to lose in a bad month without it destroying your emotional ability to trade?
- Conservative: 2% per month = $1,000 max loss/month
- Moderate: 3-5% per month = $1,500-$2,500 max loss/month
- Aggressive: 5-10% per month = $2,500-$5,000 max loss/month (high risk of ruin)
Most professional traders target 2-3% risk per month. Anything above 5% per month is gambling.
Why? Because you will have losing months. If you risk 10% of your account per trade, one bad month wipes you out. If you risk 1-2% per trade, you can have 10 losing trades in a row before real damage.
Position Sizing Frameworks
There are several frameworks for calculating position size. Each has different assumptions and practical tradeoffs.
Framework 1: The 1-2% Risk Rule (Simplest)
How it works:
- Define max loss per trade = 1-2% of your account
- Calculate position size based on max loss of that trade
- Scale across multiple positions based on portfolio allocation
Example:
- Account size: $50,000
- Max loss per trade: 1% = $500
- You're selling a bear put spread: $50 strike sell, $45 strike buy
- Max loss per spread = $500 (the difference between strikes = $5, times 100 shares)
- Number of contracts you can sell: 1 contract (1 × 100 shares = $500 max loss)
Simple formula:
Position Size (contracts) = (Account Size × Risk %) / Max Loss Per Contract
Advantages:
- Dead simple; works on the back of a napkin
- Scalable; as account grows, position size grows proportionally
- Prevents over-leverage
Disadvantages:
- Ignores Greeks and volatility changes
- Treats all strategies identically (ignores probability)
- Doesn't account for correlation between positions
When to use: Beginning traders, systematic income traders, traders with small accounts
Framework 2: Kelly Criterion (Advanced)
How it works: The Kelly Criterion calculates the optimal % of your bankroll to risk per trade based on win rate and odds.
Position Size % = (Win Rate × Average Win) - (Loss Rate × Average Loss)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Average Win
Example:
- Your bear put spreads have a 70% win rate
- Average win: $300 per contract
- Average loss: $700 per contract (2x the width)
- Account: $50,000
Calculation:
Position Size % = (0.70 × $300) - (0.30 × $700)
─────────────────────────────
$300
= ($210 - $210) / $300 = 0%
Wait—that's 0%? That means this strategy has no edge!
Let me recalculate with better odds:
Better strategy:
- 65% win rate
- Average win: $500
- Average loss: $900
- Kelly: (0.65 × $500) - (0.35 × $900) / $500
- Kelly: ($325 - $315) / $500 = 0.02 = 2%
This means risk 2% of your bankroll per trade for optimal growth.
On a $50,000 account, 2% = $1,000 per trade.
Advantages:
- Maximizes compounding growth rate
- Account for win rate and odds mathematically
- Proven in gambling and professional trading
Disadvantages:
- Requires accurate win rate and average win/loss data
- Can be volatile (full Kelly can lead to big drawdowns)
- Ignores market regime changes
Pro tip: Use "Half Kelly" (1% instead of 2%) for more stability and less volatility.
When to use: Experienced traders with track records, traders scaling portfolios
Framework 3: Greeks-Based Position Sizing
How it works: Instead of risking a % of account per trade, manage your position size based on portfolio-level Greeks.
Target portfolio Greeks:
- Delta: 0 to +20 (directionally neutral to slightly bullish)
- Theta: +50 to +100 per day (collecting time decay daily)
- Gamma: -50 to -100 (risk of gamma shock but manageable)
- Vega: -100 to +50 (slightly short volatility, or neutral)
Example:
- Current portfolio: 2 short put spreads = Delta: +30, Theta: +80/day, Gamma: -120
- You want to add another put spread: Delta +5, Theta +40/day, Gamma -60
- New portfolio: Delta +35, Theta +120/day, Gamma -180
- Decision: Don't add the spread; gamma is getting too risky
Advantages:
- Holistic; accounts for portfolio correlation
- Anticipates Greeks risk; prevents gamma explosions
- Adaptive to market conditions
Disadvantages:
- Requires real-time Greeks monitoring (broker tools or third-party)
- More complex calculation
- Needs ongoing adjustment
When to use: Multi-leg traders, portfolio managers, experienced traders
Loss Control Mechanisms: The Kill Switches
Position sizing prevents catastrophe. Loss control mechanisms stop individual trades from destroying your account.
Stop-Loss Rule 1: Absolute Dollar Loss
How it works: Close any position if the loss exceeds a fixed dollar amount.
Example:
- Max loss per position: $500
- You sold a put spread expecting $300 max loss
- Market gaps down; your loss is now $750
- Kill switch triggered; close the position at $750 loss
- You absorbed the loss; you're alive for tomorrow
Formula:
Stop Loss Limit = Max Loss Per Contract × Number of Contracts
Advantages:
- Simple; mechanical
- Prevents single position from exploding
Disadvantages:
- Can stop you out at exactly the wrong time (market reverses next day)
- Ignores time remaining (might close winners prematurely)
Rule of thumb: Set stops at 2x your max loss per position.
Stop-Loss Rule 2: % Loss Relative to Premium Collected
How it works: Close if the loss reaches a multiple of the premium you collected.
Example:
- You sold a put spread; collected $200 premium
- Stop loss: 2x collected premium = $400 loss
- If loss hits $400, close the position
Advantages:
- Ties stop loss to what you got paid
- Respects the probabilities (you expected 70% POP; stop at 2x means you got paid enough)
Disadvantages:
- Less effective for high-probability trades (1% POP = small premium, large stop)
Rule of thumb: For 70%+ POP trades, set stops at 2x collected premium. For 60% POP, set at 1.5x. For less than 60%, set at 1x.
Stop-Loss Rule 3: Greeks-Based Dynamic Stops
How it works: Close if the Greeks of your position move into dangerous territory.
Example:
- You sold a $100 put; Delta: -0.30 (30% probability ITM)
- Market crashes; put delta shifts to -0.60
- Probability of assignment doubled; close to protect
- Mechanical rule: Close if delta exceeds -0.50 (for short puts)
Advantages:
- Adaptive; adjusts with market volatility
- Prevents gamma shocks by exiting high-gamma positions
Disadvantages:
- Requires real-time Greeks monitoring
- Can be noisy in volatile markets
Rule of thumb:
- Short puts: Close if delta exceeds -0.50 to -0.60
- Short calls: Close if delta exceeds +0.50 to +0.60
- Short strangles: Close if either leg exceeds -0.45
Stop-Loss Rule 4: Time-Based Stops (DTE Boundaries)
How it works: Close positions automatically at specific DTE thresholds if they haven't hit profit targets.
Example:
- You sold a 45-DTE put spread targeting 50% max profit
- At 21 DTE, you're still at breakeven (not profitable)
- Automatic close; revert to cash
- Reason: Gamma risk explodes into final expiration week; not worth staying in unprofitable position
Advantages:
- Prevents gamma explosions
- Keeps you out of dangerous late-expiration zone if position isn't working
Disadvantages:
- Locks in losses on trades that might recover
- Ignores probability of recovery
Rule of thumb:
- If position is unprofitable at 14 DTE, close it
- If position is unprofitable at 7 DTE, close it immediately (gamma risk)
Portfolio-Level Risk Management
Individual position stops are necessary but insufficient. You also need portfolio-level controls.
Portfolio Control 1: Maximum Correlation
How it works: Limit positions in correlated sectors/tickers.
Example:
- You have short put spreads on: AAPL, GOOGL, MSFT, NVDA
- All are mega-cap tech stocks; deeply correlated
- If tech crashes, all 4 positions lose simultaneously
- Portfolio risk: 4x the individual position risk (correlation multiplier)
Solution:
- Limit to 2 tech positions; diversify into healthcare, energy, financials
- Correlation drops; portfolio risk is now linear instead of compounded
Rule of thumb: No more than 30-50% of portfolio in one sector; no more than 3-4 correlated positions
Portfolio Control 2: Maximum Greeks at Portfolio Level
How it works: Monitor and cap portfolio delta, theta, gamma, vega.
Target levels (monthly income strategy):
- Delta: 0 to +30 (directionally neutral to slightly bullish)
- Theta: +50 to +150 per day (collecting 50-150 bucks daily from time decay)
- Gamma: -100 to +0 (short gamma is fine; risk is managed)
- Vega: -50 to +50 (neutral to slight short volatility)
If your portfolio hits limits, don't add new positions.
Example:
- Portfolio Theta: +200/day (too high; you're over-leveraged)
- Portfolio Gamma: -200 (too negative; gamma shock risk is high)
- Decision: Close 1-2 positions before adding new ones
Advantages:
- Prevents catastrophic gamma explosions
- Keeps you from over-leveraging on theta
Disadvantages:
- Requires ongoing monitoring
- Can constrain growth
Portfolio Control 3: Maximum Drawdown Limit
How it works: Set a maximum peak-to-trough loss for your account. If you hit it, stop trading until you recover.
Example:
- Account high water mark: $50,000
- Current account value: $47,500 (5% drawdown)
- Stop trading limit: 10% drawdown = $45,000
- You have $2,500 more loss room before you stop
Why this matters:
- Prevents revenge trading (the worst trades come when you're desperate)
- Forces you to step back and recalibrate
- Protects against catastrophic months
Rule of thumb:
- 5% drawdown: Reduce position size (but keep trading)
- 10% drawdown: Stop all new positions (only close/manage existing)
- 15%+ drawdown: Pause trading entirely; journal and review
Implementation: A Practical Checklist
Here's a concrete workflow for implementing these rules:
Before Each Trading Day
-
Check portfolio Greeks:
- Delta: _____ (Target: 0 to +30)
- Theta: _____ (Target: +50 to +150)
- Gamma: _____ (Target: -100 to 0)
- Vega: _____ (Target: -50 to +50)
-
Identify positions at risk:
- Any position with more than 50% max loss? Flag it
- Any position above 21 DTE and unprofitable? Flag it
- Any position with delta below -0.60? Flag it
-
Review sector concentration:
- Tech positions: _____ (should be less than 50% of portfolio)
- Healthcare: _____ (diversify if needed)
- Financials, Energy, etc: _____
Daily Management
-
Execute stop-losses:
- Any position hit 2x max loss? Close it.
- Any position at 14 DTE and unprofitable? Close it.
-
Harvest winners:
- Any position at 50% max profit? Close half.
- Any position at 75% max profit? Close the rest.
-
Rebalance Greeks if needed:
- If Gamma > -100, close a short position
- If Theta < +50, add a new position (if drawdown permits)
Monthly Review
-
Calculate key metrics:
- Total return (%): _____
- Max drawdown (%): _____
- Sharpe ratio (return / std dev): _____
- Win rate (%): _____
- Average winner / average loser: _____
-
Adjust position sizing:
- If drawdown exceeds 10%, reduce position sizes 20%
- If max loss on any trade exceeded $X, reduce position sizes 10%
- If Theta consistently >+200, reduce position sizes 10%
-
Check correlation:
- Did any sector exceed 60% of portfolio? Rebalance.
- Did drawdown spike on one bad day? Check correlation.
Common Risk Management Mistakes
Mistake 1: Ignoring Position Sizing Entirely
Problem: Selling 10 contracts of puts because "I like the trade," without calculating position sizing.
Fix: Always calculate position size before entering. Max loss must fit your 1-2% rule.
Mistake 2: Setting Stops Too Tight
Problem: Selling a put spread, setting stop at 1.5x max loss, getting stopped out the next day as the market recovers.
Fix: Set stops at 2-3x max loss for high-probability trades. Let theta work for 7+ days before judging.
Mistake 3: Not Monitoring Greeks
Problem: Holding 5 short put spreads (all short gamma) when portfolio gamma reaches -300. One gap down = catastrophe.
Fix: Monitor portfolio Greeks daily. Don't add positions if gamma is already high.
Mistake 4: Over-Concentrating in One Sector
Problem: Holding 80% of portfolio in tech; tech crashes; account gets destroyed.
Fix: Diversify. No sector over 50%; no stock correlates above 0.70.
Mistake 5: Revenge Trading After a Loss
Problem: Lost $1,000 on a trade; immediately open 3 new positions to "make it back."
Fix: Stick to your position-sizing rules. Take breaks after big losses; don't compound.
Linking Risk Management into Your Larger Options Strategy
Risk management isn't separate from your strategy—it's part of it:
- Position sizing in income strategies: Link to Selling Covered Calls for Income: Step-by-Step Income Guide for income-specific sizing
- Managing Greeks in spreads: Link to Options Greeks by DTE: Delta, Gamma, Theta Behavior Across Expiration Phases for deep Greeks understanding
- Assignment risk as a portfolio-level risk: Link to Options Assignment Probability: Calculator & Decision Framework for assignment-level position planning
- Theta harvesting scaled by risk: Link to Theta Decay in Options: DTE Curves, Strategies & Time Value Optimization for combining risk management with theta extraction
Key Takeaways
-
Define your account risk tolerance first. 1-2% per month for professionals; anything above 5% is gambling.
-
Use position sizing frameworks to scale. 1-2% rule for beginners; Kelly Criterion for experienced traders; Greeks-based for sophisticated portfolios.
-
Implement mechanical stop-losses. 2x max loss, or 2x collected premium, or Greeks-based deltas. No emotion.
-
Monitor portfolio Greeks daily. Don't let gamma creep above -100; don't let theta creep above +200.
-
Diversify across sectors and correlations. No single sector over 50% of portfolio; no correlation above 0.70 between positions.
-
Track your monthly metrics. Win rate, average win/loss, Sharpe ratio. Adjust position sizing quarterly based on performance.
-
Step back when drawdowns hit 10%. Review your strategy; reduce position sizes; avoid revenge trading.
The traders who survive and compound are the ones who size small, follow rules, and let time and probability do the work. Risk management isn't exciting—but it's what separates winners from blown-up accounts.
Start small. Size correctly. Scale slowly. Compound over years.
Related Articles
Foundation & Risk Management:
- Early Assignment in Options: Risk Management & Prevention - Understanding and managing assignment risk
- Options Assignment Probability: Calculator & Decision Framework - Probability modeling for better sizing
- Selling Options for Income: Complete Strategy Guide - Complete income framework with risk rules
Strategy Implementation:
- Cash-Secured Puts Playbook: DTE Optimization & Assignment Risk - Sizing CSPs correctly
- Options Greeks Explained: Income Trader's Guide - Greeks-based risk management
- Put Credit Spreads: Risk-Defined Income Strategy - Spread sizing for defined risk
- Call Credit Spreads: Bearish Income with Defined Risk - Bearish spread risk management
- Iron Condor Strategy: Profit from Range-Bound Markets - Multi-leg position sizing
Advanced Metrics:
- Options Greeks by DTE: Delta, Gamma, Theta Behavior Across Expiration Phases - Portfolio Greeks monitoring
- Portfolio Income Layering: Covered Calls + Dividends + Cash-Secured Puts - Multi-strategy position sizing
- Implied Volatility & Days to Expiry: Timing Your Options Entries - Risk-adjusted entry sizing