Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

WPM 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Two paired wheel simulations on WPM, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +19.0 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return17.6%36.6%+19.0 pp
Annualized return8.5%16.9%+8.5 pp
Buy-and-hold return110.3%110.3%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)43.4%33.6%-9.7 pp
Assignment rate36.4%18.8%-17.6 pp
Call-away rate50.0%38.5%-11.5 pp
Average cycle return1.6%1.1%—
Sample cycles1132—
History days728728—
Entry fills1745—
Entry fills priced from real option bars47%44%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—31%—

How WPM compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 21 and behind on 16. The WPM total-return delta of +19.0 pp ranks 4th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is +2.0 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 17.6% against 110.3% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 92.7 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its precious-metals peers GDX, GLD, NEM and SLV, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 4 of 4; WPM itself came in at +19.0 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for WPM shows a put assignment rate of 21.9% and wheel P&L of $2,756 against $7,149 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricWPMFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+19.0 pp+2.0 pp4th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-9.7 pp-0.6 pp2nd of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return36.6%16.0%7th of 37
21-Day annualized return16.9%7.7%7th of 37
Standard total return17.6%15.0%17th of 37
21-Day max drawdown33.6%19.0%34th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate38.5%42.1%23rd of 37
Standard annualized return8.5%7.2%17th of 37
Buy-and-hold return110.3%26.4%5th of 37
Standard max drawdown43.4%20.8%34th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate36.4%36.4%17th of 37
21-Day assignment rate18.8%31.8%31st of 37
21-Day sample cycles322810th of 37
21-Day average cycle return1.1%0.6%8th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
WPM17.6%36.6%+19.0 pp110.3%43.4%33.6%36.4%18.8%
GDX35.0%39.5%+4.5 pp124.5%36.1%26.5%33.3%35.7%
GLD3.4%11.3%+7.9 pp50.2%16.6%18.9%25.0%15.2%
NEM28.8%43.5%+14.7 pp168.5%34.6%30.0%45.5%26.9%
SLV5.7%16.0%+10.4 pp64.6%35.8%37.8%25.0%31.0%

WPM wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

WPM buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 WPM shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-08 ($4,180) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$3,264).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-11−$249—$0$249$615
2024-12−$858−$609$0$858$874
2025-01−$235$623$0$235$907
2025-02$410$645$544$134$907
2025-03$1,281$871$1,281$0$907
2025-04$1,870$589$2,032$162$907
2025-05$2,193$323$2,193$0$927
2025-06$2,498$305$2,793$295$927
2025-07$2,669$171$3,090$421$927
2025-08$3,560$891$3,587$27$967
2025-09$4,702$1,142$4,702$0$967
2025-10$3,170−$1,532$4,868$1,698$1,905
2025-11$4,523$1,353$4,868$345$1,913
2025-12$5,270$747$5,940$670$1,913
2026-01$6,705$1,435$9,148$2,443$2,443
2026-02$9,883$3,178$9,883$0$2,540
2026-03$6,619−$3,264$10,090$3,471$5,110
2026-04$6,164−$455$10,090$3,926$5,110
2026-05$6,778$614$10,090$3,312$5,110
2026-06$4,750−$2,028$10,090$5,340$5,820
2026-07$4,421−$329$10,090$5,669$6,227
2026-08$8,601$4,180$10,090$1,489$6,227
2026-09$6,890−$1,711$10,090$3,200$6,227
2026-10$5,176−$1,714$10,090$4,914$6,227
2026-11$7,149$1,973$10,090$2,941$6,227
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06, refreshed 2026-11-08.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 47% (standard) and 44% (21-Day) of entry fills and 31% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on WPM?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +19.0 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.