Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

BAC 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on BAC, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -17.5 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return1.7%-15.8%-17.5 pp
Annualized return0.8%-8.3%-9.1 pp
Buy-and-hold return21.1%21.1%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)25.3%21.9%-3.4 pp
Assignment rate30.8%24.2%-6.6 pp
Call-away rate60.0%58.3%-1.7 pp
Average cycle return0.1%-0.5%—
Sample cycles1333—
History days728728—
Entry fills1845—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%47%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—47%—

How BAC compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The BAC total-return delta of -17.5 pp ranks 33rd of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 1.7% against 21.1% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 19.4 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its financials peers JPM and XLF, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 0 of 2; BAC itself came in at -17.5 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for BAC shows a put assignment rate of 23.5% and wheel P&L of $541 against $891 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricBACFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-17.5 pp-1.4 pp33rd of 37
Rule drawdown delta-3.4 pp-1.3 pp14th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return-15.8%14.4%35th of 37
21-Day annualized return-8.3%7.0%35th of 37
Standard total return1.7%14.7%32nd of 37
21-Day max drawdown21.9%20.8%21st of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate58.3%39.1%2nd of 37
Standard annualized return0.8%7.1%32nd of 37
Buy-and-hold return21.1%38.6%26th of 37
Standard max drawdown25.3%24.3%23rd of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate30.8%30.8%18th of 37
21-Day assignment rate24.2%32.0%25th of 37
21-Day sample cycles33275th of 37
21-Day average cycle return-0.5%0.5%35th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
BAC1.7%-15.8%-17.5 pp21.1%25.3%21.9%30.8%24.2%
JPM36.4%18.2%-18.2 pp50.7%25.8%19.9%21.4%21.2%
XLF13.5%8.7%-4.8 pp16.6%15.0%13.1%55.6%33.3%

BAC wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

BAC buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 BAC shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2024-11 ($569) and the worst was 2026-09 (−$751).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$50—$33$83$83
2024-11$519$569$545$26$132
2024-12$163−$356$545$382$439
2025-01$398$235$545$147$439
2025-02$378−$20$545$167$439
2025-03−$59−$437$545$604$816
2025-04−$244−$185$545$789$1,338
2025-05$181$425$545$364$1,338
2025-06$500$319$545$45$1,338
2025-07$495−$5$661$166$1,338
2025-08$842$347$842$0$1,338
2025-09$927$85$1,010$83$1,338
2025-10$1,113$186$1,113$0$1,338
2025-11$1,133$20$1,179$46$1,338
2025-12$1,268$135$1,393$125$1,338
2026-01$1,088−$180$1,493$405$1,338
2026-02$751−$337$1,493$742$1,338
2026-03$643−$108$1,493$850$1,338
2026-04$1,114$471$1,493$379$1,338
2026-05$928−$186$1,493$565$1,338
2026-06$1,466$538$1,587$121$1,338
2026-07$1,963$497$2,030$67$1,338
2026-08$1,962−$1$2,249$287$1,338
2026-09$1,211−$751$2,249$1,038$1,338
2026-10$891−$320$2,249$1,358$1,358
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 47% (21-Day) of entry fills and 47% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on BAC?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -17.5 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.