Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

DIA 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on DIA, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -3.2 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return10.1%7.0%-3.2 pp
Annualized return4.9%3.4%-1.5 pp
Buy-and-hold return20.0%20.0%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)14.7%14.7%-0.0 pp
Assignment rate21.4%13.5%-7.9 pp
Call-away rate75.0%50.0%-25.0 pp
Average cycle return0.7%0.2%—
Sample cycles1437—
History days728728—
Entry fills1847—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%49%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—47%—

How DIA compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The DIA total-return delta of -3.2 pp ranks 21st of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 10.1% against 20.0% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 9.9 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its index and broad sector ETF peers IWM, QQQ and SPY, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 1 of 3; DIA itself came in at -3.2 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for DIA shows a put assignment rate of 12.8% and wheel P&L of $1,846 against $8,646 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricDIAFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-3.2 pp-1.4 pp21st of 37
Rule drawdown delta-0.0 pp-1.3 pp25th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return7.0%14.4%28th of 37
21-Day annualized return3.4%7.0%28th of 37
Standard total return10.1%14.7%27th of 37
21-Day max drawdown14.7%20.8%9th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate50.0%39.1%6th of 37
Standard annualized return4.9%7.1%27th of 37
Buy-and-hold return20.0%38.6%27th of 37
Standard max drawdown14.7%24.3%8th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate21.4%30.8%30th of 37
21-Day assignment rate13.5%32.0%35th of 37
21-Day sample cycles37272nd of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.2%0.5%29th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
DIA10.1%7.0%-3.2 pp20.0%14.7%14.7%21.4%13.5%
IWM6.5%3.3%-3.2 pp19.8%19.6%22.5%30.8%16.2%
QQQ18.1%15.3%-2.8 pp43.5%16.3%16.8%12.5%13.3%
SPY8.7%10.2%+1.5 pp30.6%14.6%15.4%12.5%10.0%

DIA wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

DIA buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 DIA shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-04 ($3,346) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$2,647).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$1,497—$0$1,497$1,497
2024-11$1,745$3,242$1,745$0$1,497
2024-12−$714−$2,459$1,830$2,544$2,672
2025-01$1,275$1,989$1,830$555$3,161
2025-02$573−$702$1,830$1,257$3,161
2025-03−$1,276−$1,849$1,830$3,106$4,216
2025-04−$2,630−$1,354$1,830$4,460$7,446
2025-05−$979$1,651$1,830$2,809$7,446
2025-06$801$1,780$1,830$1,029$7,446
2025-07$869$68$1,830$961$7,446
2025-08$2,345$1,476$2,415$70$7,446
2025-09$3,110$765$3,110$0$7,446
2025-10$4,303$1,193$4,451$148$7,446
2025-11$4,454$151$5,012$558$7,446
2025-12$4,793$339$5,523$730$7,446
2026-01$5,639$846$6,326$687$7,446
2026-02$5,702$63$6,926$1,224$7,446
2026-03$3,055−$2,647$6,926$3,871$7,446
2026-04$6,401$3,346$6,926$525$7,446
2026-05$7,814$1,413$7,814$0$7,446
2026-06$8,975$1,161$8,975$0$7,446
2026-07$9,168$193$9,745$577$7,446
2026-08$9,893$725$11,017$1,124$7,446
2026-09$7,591−$2,302$11,017$3,426$7,446
2026-10$8,646$1,055$11,017$2,371$7,446
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 49% (21-Day) of entry fills and 47% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on DIA?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -3.2 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.