Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

DIA wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $9,243 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$9243.31
Total P&L
$5743.31
Assign %
11.4%
Call-away %
18.8%
Cycles
4
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

Buy & hold finished $1467.69 ahead of the wheel (earned more: $7211.00 vs $5743.31).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$7211.00$5743.31
Largest drop$7446.00$6903.10

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 4 cycles).

Simulated premium was $9,243. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$3,500. Combined realized P&L was $5,743.

Puts were assigned on 11.4% of put trades (4 of 35). Calls were assigned away on 18.8% of call trades (3 of 16).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($5,743) trailed buy-and-hold P&L ($7,211) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $6,903 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $6,903, from the 2025-02-05 peak to the 2025-04-08 trough, and got back to that peak on 2025-10-13. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $7,446 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $7,446, from the 2024-12-04 peak to the 2025-04-08 trough, and got back to that peak on 2025-08-22.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 168 of 500 days (33.6%). Its widest lead was $1,843 on 2024-12-18; its widest deficit was −$5,392 on 2026-08-05.

Wheel P&L peaked at $6,554 on 2026-11-04 and bottomed at −$5,436 on 2025-04-08. Buy-and-hold peaked at $10,270 on 2026-08-05 and bottomed at −$6,363 on 2025-04-08.

Of 51 priced entries, 27 used historical option bars, and 24 used Black-Scholes fills from realized volatility. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11$145—$998−$853$0$0
2024-12−$1,064−$1,210−$1,461$397$1,318$2,544
2025-01$1,078$2,143$528$550$343$555
2025-02$511−$567−$174$685$956$1,257
2025-03−$1,096−$1,607−$2,023$927$2,563$3,106
2025-04−$2,099−$1,003−$3,377$1,278$3,566$4,460
2025-05−$1,308$791−$1,726$418$2,775$2,809
2025-06−$817$491$54−$871$2,284$1,029
2025-07−$292$525$122−$414$1,759$961
2025-08$278$570$1,598−$1,320$1,189$70
2025-09$785$507$2,363−$1,578$682$0
2025-10$2,522$1,737$3,556−$1,034$0$148
2025-11$2,978$456$3,707−$729$0$558
2025-12$3,237$259$4,046−$809$0$730
2026-01$3,816$579$4,892−$1,076$0$687
2026-02$4,397$581$4,955−$558$0$1,224
2026-03$3,371−$1,026$2,308$1,063$1,026$3,871
2026-04$3,488$117$5,654−$2,166$1,754$525
2026-05$3,845$357$7,067−$3,222$1,397$0
2026-06$4,459$614$8,228−$3,769$783$0
2026-07$4,878$419$8,421−$3,543$364$577
2026-08$5,156$278$9,146−$3,990$86$1,124
2026-09$3,797−$1,359$6,844−$3,047$1,530$3,426
2026-10$4,956$1,159$7,702−$2,746$1,076$2,568
2026-11$4,465−$491$7,211−$2,746$2,089$3,059

Cash-secured puts

Trades
35
Assignments
4 (11.4%)
Simulated premium
$7,045
Avg premium
$201

Covered calls

Trades
16
Called away
3 (18.8%)
Simulated premium
$2,198
Stock / assignment P&L
−$3,500

How DIA compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. DIA is not one of them.

Simulated premium equals 160.9% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its index and broad sector ETF peers IWM, QQQ, SPY and XLI, DIA sits below the peer median put assignment rate of 15.3%. 2 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, while DIA did not.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for DIA uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished -9.4 pp behind holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricDIAFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate11.4%31.0%44th of 45
Simulated premium$9,243$10,12824th of 45
Wheel P&L$5,743$2,82815th of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$7,211$3,90115th of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold−$1,468−$49531st of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
DIA11.4%$9,243$5,743$7,211Wheel behind
IWM20.0%$10,257$3,757$3,555Wheel ahead
QQQ12.5%$21,936$11,936$14,196Wheel behind
SPY10.5%$14,816$11,316$13,710Wheel behind
XLI18.2%$4,742$4,992$2,058Wheel ahead

DIA 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 27 bar / 24 HV

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did DIA collect this premium?

No. The $9,243 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.