Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

XOM 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-25 to 2026-10-23.

Two paired wheel simulations on XOM, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -20.1 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return37.2%17.1%-20.1 pp
Annualized return17.2%8.3%-8.9 pp
Buy-and-hold return53.3%53.3%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)13.7%12.0%-1.7 pp
Assignment rate36.4%31.0%-5.4 pp
Call-away rate57.1%50.0%-7.1 pp
Average cycle return3.4%0.6%—
Sample cycles1129—
History days728728—
Entry fills1847—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%49%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—51%—

How XOM compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 16 and behind on 21. The XOM total-return delta of -20.1 pp ranks 35th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -0.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 37.2% against 53.3% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 16.1 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its energy peers COP and CVX, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 2; XOM itself came in at -20.1 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for XOM shows a put assignment rate of 45.5% and wheel P&L of $6,260 against $5,897 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricXOMFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-20.1 pp-0.4 pp35th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-1.7 pp-1.7 pp19th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return17.1%16.8%18th of 37
21-Day annualized return8.3%8.1%18th of 37
Standard total return37.2%19.6%4th of 37
21-Day max drawdown12.0%19.0%7th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate50.0%42.1%8th of 37
Standard annualized return17.2%9.4%4th of 37
Buy-and-hold return53.3%42.2%11th of 37
Standard max drawdown13.7%20.2%6th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate36.4%33.3%16th of 37
21-Day assignment rate31.0%31.0%19th of 37
21-Day sample cycles292814th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.6%0.6%21st of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
XOM37.2%17.1%-20.1 pp53.3%13.7%12.0%36.4%31.0%
COP23.8%23.9%+0.1 pp44.2%15.7%16.1%40.0%52.0%
CVX9.2%10.2%+1.0 pp54.6%20.0%18.5%40.0%23.5%

XOM wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-25 to 2026-10-23, refreshed 2026-10-25.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 49% (21-Day) of entry fills and 51% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on XOM?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -20.1 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.