Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

TLT 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on TLT, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +2.1 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return0.4%2.5%+2.1 pp
Annualized return0.2%1.2%+1.0 pp
Buy-and-hold return-14.7%-14.7%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)11.7%10.1%-1.6 pp
Assignment rate20.0%31.2%+11.2 pp
Call-away rate12.5%12.9%+0.4 pp
Average cycle return0.0%0.2%—
Sample cycles1016—
History days728728—
Entry fills1847—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%49%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—51%—

How TLT compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The TLT total-return delta of +2.1 pp ranks 17th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 0.4% against -14.7% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel beat holding the shares by 15.1 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its defensive, healthcare and income peers COST, KO, PG and WMT, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 4; TLT itself came in at +2.1 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for TLT shows a put assignment rate of 15.0% and wheel P&L of $1,084 against −$1,382 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricTLTFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+2.1 pp-1.4 pp17th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-1.6 pp-1.3 pp18th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return2.5%14.4%34th of 37
21-Day annualized return1.2%7.0%34th of 37
Standard total return0.4%14.7%33rd of 37
21-Day max drawdown10.1%20.8%2nd of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate12.9%39.1%37th of 37
Standard annualized return0.2%7.1%33rd of 37
Buy-and-hold return-14.7%38.6%35th of 37
Standard max drawdown11.7%24.3%4th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate20.0%30.8%33rd of 37
21-Day assignment rate31.2%32.0%21st of 37
21-Day sample cycles162737th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.2%0.5%31st of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
TLT0.4%2.5%+2.1 pp-14.7%11.7%10.1%20.0%31.2%
COST16.7%21.8%+5.1 pp11.2%20.2%17.0%62.5%31.8%
KO13.7%16.0%+2.2 pp33.3%11.2%10.5%45.5%40.0%
PG12.2%3.2%-9.0 pp-7.0%17.3%13.4%80.0%45.0%
WMT24.7%23.3%-1.4 pp46.1%17.8%16.5%15.4%36.0%

TLT wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

TLT buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 TLT shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2025-02 ($467) and the worst was 2024-12 (−$664).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$142—$0$142$198
2024-11$10$152$10$0$407
2024-12−$654−$664$52$706$729
2025-01−$611$43$52$663$910
2025-02−$144$467$52$196$910
2025-03−$284−$140$52$336$910
2025-04−$440−$156$52$492$910
2025-05−$759−$319$52$811$1,042
2025-06−$562$197$52$614$1,042
2025-07−$695−$133$52$747$1,042
2025-08−$727−$32$52$779$1,042
2025-09−$450$277$52$502$1,042
2025-10−$358$92$52$410$1,042
2025-11−$366−$8$52$418$1,042
2025-12−$671−$305$52$723$1,042
2026-01−$674−$3$52$726$1,042
2026-02−$305$369$52$357$1,042
2026-03−$718−$413$52$770$1,042
2026-04−$825−$107$52$877$1,042
2026-05−$811$14$52$863$1,137
2026-06−$745$66$52$797$1,137
2026-07−$1,162−$417$52$1,214$1,214
2026-08−$1,135$27$52$1,187$1,304
2026-09−$1,609−$474$52$1,661$1,661
2026-10−$1,382$227$52$1,434$1,728
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 49% (21-Day) of entry fills and 51% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on TLT?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +2.1 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.