Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

WMT 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Two paired wheel simulations on WMT, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -24.8 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return35.0%10.2%-24.8 pp
Annualized return16.2%5.0%-11.2 pp
Buy-and-hold return48.0%48.0%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)16.2%18.3%+2.1 pp
Assignment rate30.0%35.7%+5.7 pp
Call-away rate37.5%50.0%+12.5 pp
Average cycle return3.5%0.4%—
Sample cycles1028—
History days728728—
Entry fills1848—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%50%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—50%—

How WMT compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 21 and behind on 16. The WMT total-return delta of -24.8 pp ranks 36th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is +2.0 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 35.0% against 48.0% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 13.0 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its defensive, healthcare and income peers COST, LLY, UNH and XLP, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 1 of 4; WMT itself came in at -24.8 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for WMT shows a put assignment rate of 34.6% and wheel P&L of $3,328 against $4,069 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricWMTFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-24.8 pp+2.0 pp36th of 37
Rule drawdown delta+2.1 pp-0.6 pp27th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return10.2%16.0%27th of 37
21-Day annualized return5.0%7.7%27th of 37
Standard total return35.0%15.0%4th of 37
21-Day max drawdown18.3%19.0%16th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate50.0%42.1%7th of 37
Standard annualized return16.2%7.2%4th of 37
Buy-and-hold return48.0%26.4%14th of 37
Standard max drawdown16.2%20.8%13th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate30.0%36.4%23rd of 37
21-Day assignment rate35.7%31.8%10th of 37
21-Day sample cycles282816th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.4%0.6%26th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
WMT35.0%10.2%-24.8 pp48.0%16.2%18.3%30.0%35.7%
COST16.5%20.4%+4.0 pp11.6%14.1%14.9%57.1%31.8%
LLY65.6%17.7%-47.9 pp62.8%17.0%23.5%45.5%39.3%
UNH-27.5%-37.5%-10.0 pp-36.0%49.1%52.1%57.1%34.6%
XLP18.3%17.8%-0.5 pp11.5%7.9%8.0%57.1%21.4%

WMT wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

WMT buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 WMT shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-10 ($1,959) and the worst was 2026-05 (−$1,618).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-11$767—$767$0$142
2024-12$552−$215$1,087$535$535
2025-01$1,333$781$1,382$49$570
2025-02$1,378$45$2,022$644$1,138
2025-03$296−$1,082$2,022$1,726$2,055
2025-04$1,242$946$2,022$780$2,326
2025-05$1,389$147$2,022$633$2,326
2025-06$1,295−$94$2,022$727$2,326
2025-07$1,315$20$2,022$707$2,326
2025-08$1,215−$100$2,022$807$2,326
2025-09$1,823$608$2,022$199$2,326
2025-10$1,635−$188$2,420$785$2,326
2025-11$2,568$933$2,568$0$2,326
2025-12$2,658$90$3,196$538$2,326
2026-01$3,431$773$3,553$122$2,326
2026-02$4,312$881$4,906$594$2,326
2026-03$3,945−$367$4,906$961$2,326
2026-04$4,710$765$4,906$196$2,326
2026-05$3,092−$1,618$4,937$1,845$2,326
2026-06$2,843−$249$4,937$2,094$2,326
2026-07$2,637−$206$4,937$2,300$2,580
2026-08$2,004−$633$4,937$2,933$3,157
2026-09$1,909−$95$4,937$3,028$3,157
2026-10$3,868$1,959$4,937$1,069$3,157
2026-11$4,069$201$4,937$868$3,157
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06, refreshed 2026-11-08.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 50% (21-Day) of entry fills and 50% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on WMT?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -24.8 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.