Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

IWM wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $10,257 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$10256.67
Total P&L
$3756.67
Assign %
20.0%
Call-away %
28.6%
Cycles
6
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

The wheel finished $201.67 ahead of buy & hold (earned more: $3756.67 vs $3555.00).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$3555.00$3756.67
Largest drop$6758.00$4880.19

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 6 cycles).

Simulated premium was $10,257. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$6,500. Combined realized P&L was $3,757.

Puts were assigned on 20.0% of put trades (6 of 30). Calls were assigned away on 28.6% of call trades (6 of 21).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($3,757) beat buy-and-hold P&L ($3,555) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $4,880 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $4,880, from the 2025-02-05 peak to the 2025-04-08 trough, and got back to that peak on 2025-08-13. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $6,758 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $6,758, from the 2024-11-25 peak to the 2025-04-08 trough, and got back to that peak on 2025-09-18.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 345 of 500 days (69.0%). Its widest lead was $2,492 on 2024-12-19; its widest deficit was −$2,589 on 2026-06-25.

Wheel P&L peaked at $4,798 on 2026-09-04 and bottomed at −$4,214 on 2025-04-08. Buy-and-hold peaked at $6,697 on 2026-08-14 and bottomed at −$6,330 on 2025-04-08.

Of 51 priced entries, 7 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, 27 used historical option bars, and 17 used Black-Scholes fills from realized volatility. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11$459—$375$84$0$53
2024-12−$553−$1,012−$1,716$1,163$1,219$2,144
2025-01$262$816−$1,164$1,426$403$1,592
2025-02−$619−$881−$2,347$1,728$1,285$2,775
2025-03−$1,747−$1,128−$3,863$2,116$2,413$4,291
2025-04−$2,394−$647−$4,326$1,932$3,060$4,754
2025-05−$1,999$395−$3,305$1,306$2,665$3,733
2025-06−$889$1,110−$2,233$1,344$1,555$2,661
2025-07−$560$330−$1,873$1,313$1,226$2,301
2025-08$429$988−$295$724$309$723
2025-09$752$323$384$368$0$288
2025-10$1,321$569$811$510$0$410
2025-11$2,004$683$1,063$941$0$158
2025-12$1,930−$74$804$1,126$381$1,164
2026-01$2,244$314$2,153$91$67$1,014
2026-02$2,836$592$2,329$507$458$838
2026-03$2,262−$574$988$1,274$1,032$2,179
2026-04$2,444$182$3,985−$1,541$1,214$0
2026-05$3,000$556$5,231−$2,231$658$160
2026-06$3,858$858$6,233−$2,375$0$0
2026-07$4,290$432$5,308−$1,018$0$925
2026-08$4,616$326$5,581−$965$0$1,116
2026-09$3,737−$879$3,977−$240$1,061$2,720
2026-10$3,757$20$4,121−$364$1,041$2,576
2026-11$3,757$0$3,555$202$1,041$3,142

Cash-secured puts

Trades
30
Assignments
6 (20.0%)
Simulated premium
$6,582
Avg premium
$219

Covered calls

Trades
21
Called away
6 (28.6%)
Simulated premium
$3,674
Stock / assignment P&L
−$6,500

How IWM compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. IWM is one of them.

Simulated premium equals 273.0% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its index and broad sector ETF peers DIA, QQQ, SPY and XLI, IWM sits above the peer median put assignment rate of 11.9%. 1 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, as did IWM.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for IWM uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished +8.2 pp ahead of holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricIWMFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate20.0%31.0%37th of 45
Simulated premium$10,257$10,12822nd of 45
Wheel P&L$3,757$2,82820th of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$3,555$3,90125th of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold$202−$49518th of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
IWM20.0%$10,257$3,757$3,555Wheel ahead
DIA11.4%$9,243$5,743$7,211Wheel behind
QQQ12.5%$21,936$11,936$14,196Wheel behind
SPY10.5%$14,816$11,316$13,710Wheel behind
XLI18.2%$4,742$4,992$2,058Wheel ahead

IWM 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 7 IV / 27 bar / 17 HV

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did IWM collect this premium?

No. The $10,257 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.