Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

AMD 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on AMD, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +17.8 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return38.0%55.9%+17.8 pp
Annualized return17.5%24.9%+7.4 pp
Buy-and-hold return239.0%239.0%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)35.5%36.1%+0.5 pp
Assignment rate57.1%37.5%-19.6 pp
Call-away rate40.0%34.8%-5.2 pp
Average cycle return5.4%2.3%—
Sample cycles724—
History days728728—
Entry fills1747—
Entry fills priced from real option bars47%49%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—49%—

How AMD compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The AMD total-return delta of +17.8 pp ranks 5th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 38.0% against 239.0% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 201.0 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AAPL, AVGO, ORCL and SMH, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 4; AMD itself came in at +17.8 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for AMD shows a put assignment rate of 38.5% and wheel P&L of $16,977 against $37,278 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricAMDFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+17.8 pp-1.4 pp5th of 37
Rule drawdown delta+0.5 pp-1.3 pp31st of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return55.9%14.4%1st of 37
21-Day annualized return24.9%7.0%1st of 37
Standard total return38.0%14.7%3rd of 37
21-Day max drawdown36.1%20.8%35th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate34.8%39.1%23rd of 37
Standard annualized return17.5%7.1%3rd of 37
Buy-and-hold return239.0%38.6%1st of 37
Standard max drawdown35.5%24.3%33rd of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate57.1%30.8%6th of 37
21-Day assignment rate37.5%32.0%12th of 37
21-Day sample cycles242726th of 37
21-Day average cycle return2.3%0.5%1st of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
AMD38.0%55.9%+17.8 pp239.0%35.5%36.1%57.1%37.5%
AAPL30.5%7.5%-23.0 pp46.2%28.0%26.8%36.4%32.1%
AVGO37.6%25.1%-12.5 pp82.8%45.1%24.7%33.3%41.7%
ORCL-36.2%-17.3%+18.9 pp-26.6%63.9%51.3%71.4%42.9%
SMH39.6%43.4%+3.8 pp114.6%30.8%22.2%30.8%21.2%

AMD wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

AMD buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 AMD shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-05 ($16,161) and the worst was 2026-07 (−$10,476).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$1,190—$1,028$2,218$2,218
2024-11−$1,879−$689$1,028$2,907$3,135
2024-12−$3,518−$1,639$1,028$4,546$4,737
2025-01−$4,002−$484$1,028$5,030$5,208
2025-02−$5,611−$1,609$1,028$6,639$6,674
2025-03−$5,323$288$1,028$6,351$6,962
2025-04−$5,862−$539$1,028$6,890$8,804
2025-05−$4,524$1,338$1,028$5,552$8,804
2025-06−$1,407$3,117$1,028$2,435$8,804
2025-07$2,034$3,441$2,354$320$8,804
2025-08$666−$1,368$2,845$2,179$8,804
2025-09$582−$84$2,845$2,263$8,804
2025-10$10,015$9,433$10,836$821$8,804
2025-11$6,156−$3,859$10,836$4,680$8,804
2025-12$5,819−$337$10,836$5,017$8,804
2026-01$8,076$2,257$10,836$2,760$8,804
2026-02$4,424−$3,652$10,836$6,412$8,804
2026-03$4,746$322$10,836$6,090$8,804
2026-04$19,852$15,106$19,852$0$8,804
2026-05$36,013$16,161$36,212$199$8,804
2026-06$42,494$6,481$42,494$0$9,012
2026-07$32,018−$10,476$42,494$10,476$15,135
2026-08$31,475−$543$42,494$11,019$15,135
2026-09$45,579$14,104$47,466$1,887$15,135
2026-10$37,278−$8,301$49,345$12,067$15,135
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 47% (standard) and 49% (21-Day) of entry fills and 49% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on AMD?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +17.8 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.