Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

AMD wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $40,866 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$40866.04
Total P&L
$21116.04
Assign %
25.9%
Call-away %
25.0%
Cycles
7
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

Buy & hold finished $8992.96 ahead of the wheel (earned more: $30109.00 vs $21116.04).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$30109.00$21116.04
Largest drop$24502.00$19975.00

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 7 cycles).

Simulated premium was $40,866. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$19,750. Combined realized P&L was $21,116.

Puts were assigned on 25.9% of put trades (7 of 27). Calls were assigned away on 25.0% of call trades (6 of 24).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($21,116) trailed buy-and-hold P&L ($30,109) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $19,975 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $19,975, from the 2026-10-02 peak to the 2026-11-05 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $24,502 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $24,502, from the 2026-10-06 peak to the 2026-11-05 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 159 of 500 days (31.8%). Its widest lead was $5,109 on 2025-04-08; its widest deficit was −$30,616 on 2026-10-06.

Wheel P&L peaked at $19,531 on 2026-10-02 and bottomed at −$3,292 on 2025-04-21. Buy-and-hold peaked at $50,147 on 2026-10-06 and bottomed at −$6,974 on 2025-04-08.

Of 51 priced entries, 24 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, and 27 used historical option bars. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11−$310—−$1,077$767$564$1,077
2024-12−$1,371−$1,061−$2,716$1,345$1,742$2,716
2025-01−$1,315$56−$3,200$1,885$1,686$3,200
2025-02−$2,389−$1,073−$4,809$2,420$2,760$4,809
2025-03−$1,865$524−$4,521$2,656$2,236$4,521
2025-04−$1,730$135−$5,060$3,330$2,101$5,060
2025-05−$1,276$454−$3,722$2,446$1,648$3,722
2025-06−$946$330−$605−$341$1,318$605
2025-07−$260$687$2,836−$3,096$631$320
2025-08−$764−$504$1,468−$2,232$1,237$2,179
2025-09$261$1,025$1,384−$1,123$212$2,263
2025-10$2,389$2,128$10,817−$8,428$5,249$821
2025-11$657−$1,732$6,958−$6,301$6,981$4,680
2025-12$1,370$713$6,621−$5,251$6,268$5,017
2026-01$3,959$2,589$8,878−$4,919$3,679$2,760
2026-02$1,725−$2,234$5,226−$3,501$5,913$6,412
2026-03$3,551$1,826$5,548−$1,997$4,087$6,090
2026-04$6,011$2,460$20,654−$14,643$1,627$0
2026-05$10,108$4,097$36,815−$26,707$0$199
2026-06$14,683$4,575$43,296−$28,613$0$0
2026-07$13,231−$1,452$32,820−$19,589$4,075$10,476
2026-08$15,618$2,387$32,277−$16,659$3,017$11,019
2026-09$18,041$2,423$46,381−$28,340$594$1,887
2026-10$9,596−$8,445$35,685−$26,089$9,935$14,462
2026-11$4,020−$5,576$30,109−$26,089$15,511$20,038

Cash-secured puts

Trades
27
Assignments
7 (25.9%)
Simulated premium
$25,396
Avg premium
$941

Covered calls

Trades
24
Called away
6 (25.0%)
Simulated premium
$15,470
Stock / assignment P&L
−$19,750

How AMD compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. AMD is not one of them.

Simulated premium equals 193.5% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AAPL, AVGO, ORCL and SMH, AMD sits below the peer median put assignment rate of 32.9%. 3 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, while AMD did not.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for AMD uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished +64.2 pp ahead of holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricAMDFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate25.9%31.0%29th of 45
Simulated premium$40,866$10,1285th of 45
Wheel P&L$21,116$2,8283rd of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$30,109$3,9012nd of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold−$8,993−$49543rd of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
AMD25.9%$40,866$21,116$30,109Wheel behind
AAPL30.0%$13,623$2,123$11,541Wheel behind
AVGO35.7%$41,127$25,877$11,005Wheel ahead
ORCL50.0%$25,322−$5,678−$7,315Wheel ahead
SMH25.7%$38,510$28,010$20,462Wheel ahead

AMD 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 24 IV / 27 bar

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did AMD collect this premium?

No. The $40,866 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.