Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

GDX 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on GDX, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -18.8 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return28.9%10.1%-18.8 pp
Annualized return13.6%5.0%-8.6 pp
Buy-and-hold return103.3%103.3%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)24.3%26.7%+2.4 pp
Assignment rate16.7%39.3%+22.6 pp
Call-away rate33.3%52.6%+19.3 pp
Average cycle return2.4%0.4%—
Sample cycles1228—
History days728728—
Entry fills1847—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%49%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—47%—

How GDX compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The GDX total-return delta of -18.8 pp ranks 35th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 28.9% against 103.3% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 74.3 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its precious-metals peers AEM, GLD, NEM and WPM, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 4; GDX itself came in at -18.8 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for GDX shows a put assignment rate of 33.3% and wheel P&L of $2,013 against $4,456 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricGDXFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-18.8 pp-1.4 pp35th of 37
Rule drawdown delta+2.4 pp-1.3 pp34th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return10.1%14.4%23rd of 37
21-Day annualized return5.0%7.0%23rd of 37
Standard total return28.9%14.7%10th of 37
21-Day max drawdown26.7%20.8%26th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate52.6%39.1%5th of 37
Standard annualized return13.6%7.1%10th of 37
Buy-and-hold return103.3%38.6%6th of 37
Standard max drawdown24.3%24.3%19th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate16.7%30.8%34th of 37
21-Day assignment rate39.3%32.0%9th of 37
21-Day sample cycles282715th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.4%0.5%23rd of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
GDX28.9%10.1%-18.8 pp103.3%24.3%26.7%16.7%39.3%
AEM31.3%35.0%+3.8 pp119.9%28.9%28.2%23.1%37.9%
GLD15.7%11.8%-3.9 pp52.0%12.9%14.4%30.8%17.1%
NEM16.2%9.8%-6.4 pp105.8%31.1%31.6%23.1%29.6%
WPM11.9%49.4%+37.5 pp101.8%33.8%29.8%25.0%38.5%

GDX wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

GDX buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 GDX shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-08 ($2,441) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$2,407).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$281—$94$375$375
2024-11−$549−$268$94$643$858
2024-12−$924−$375$94$1,018$1,032
2025-01−$419$505$94$513$1,032
2025-02−$343$76$94$437$1,032
2025-03$282$625$282$0$1,032
2025-04$586$304$876$290$1,032
2025-05$750$164$876$126$1,032
2025-06$891$141$1,131$240$1,032
2025-07$849−$42$1,133$284$1,032
2025-08$2,002$1,153$2,002$0$1,032
2025-09$3,325$1,323$3,325$0$1,032
2025-10$2,891−$434$4,129$1,238$1,453
2025-11$4,008$1,117$4,129$121$1,616
2025-12$4,262$254$4,814$552$1,616
2026-01$5,105$843$6,901$1,796$1,796
2026-02$7,269$2,164$7,269$0$1,972
2026-03$4,862−$2,407$7,269$2,407$3,572
2026-04$4,514−$348$7,269$2,755$3,572
2026-05$4,634$120$7,269$2,635$3,572
2026-06$3,230−$1,404$7,269$4,039$4,203
2026-07$3,095−$135$7,269$4,174$4,510
2026-08$5,536$2,441$7,269$1,733$4,510
2026-09$4,465−$1,071$7,269$2,804$4,510
2026-10$4,456−$9$7,269$2,813$4,510
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 49% (21-Day) of entry fills and 47% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on GDX?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -18.8 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.