Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

NEM 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Two paired wheel simulations on NEM, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +14.7 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return28.8%43.5%+14.7 pp
Annualized return13.5%19.9%+6.3 pp
Buy-and-hold return168.5%168.5%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)34.6%30.0%-4.6 pp
Assignment rate45.5%26.9%-18.6 pp
Call-away rate66.7%31.6%-35.1 pp
Average cycle return2.6%1.7%—
Sample cycles1126—
History days728728—
Entry fills1745—
Entry fills priced from real option bars47%47%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—38%—

How NEM compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 21 and behind on 16. The NEM total-return delta of +14.7 pp ranks 5th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is +2.0 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 28.8% against 168.5% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 139.6 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its precious-metals peers AEM, GLD, SLV and WPM, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 4 of 4; NEM itself came in at +14.7 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for NEM shows a put assignment rate of 42.3% and wheel P&L of $2,828 against $7,587 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricNEMFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+14.7 pp+2.0 pp5th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-4.6 pp-0.6 pp8th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return43.5%16.0%4th of 37
21-Day annualized return19.9%7.7%4th of 37
Standard total return28.8%15.0%11th of 37
21-Day max drawdown30.0%19.0%29th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate31.6%42.1%28th of 37
Standard annualized return13.5%7.2%11th of 37
Buy-and-hold return168.5%26.4%2nd of 37
Standard max drawdown34.6%20.8%30th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate45.5%36.4%10th of 37
21-Day assignment rate26.9%31.8%23rd of 37
21-Day sample cycles262825th of 37
21-Day average cycle return1.7%0.6%3rd of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
NEM28.8%43.5%+14.7 pp168.5%34.6%30.0%45.5%26.9%
AEM32.3%45.3%+12.9 pp128.5%33.3%32.4%13.3%16.7%
GLD3.4%11.3%+7.9 pp50.2%16.6%18.9%25.0%15.2%
SLV5.7%16.0%+10.4 pp64.6%35.8%37.8%25.0%31.0%
WPM17.6%36.6%+19.0 pp110.3%43.4%33.6%36.4%18.8%

NEM wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

NEM buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 NEM shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-08 ($3,235) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$2,175).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-11−$310—$0$310$436
2024-12−$782−$472$0$782$804
2025-01−$232$550$0$232$804
2025-02−$220$12$305$525$804
2025-03$324$544$335$11$804
2025-04$764$440$1,091$327$804
2025-05$768$4$1,091$323$804
2025-06$1,322$554$1,442$120$804
2025-07$1,706$384$2,071$365$804
2025-08$2,936$1,230$2,936$0$804
2025-09$3,927$991$4,021$94$804
2025-10$3,593−$334$5,323$1,730$1,964
2025-11$4,569$976$5,323$754$1,964
2025-12$5,481$912$6,074$593$1,964
2026-01$6,731$1,250$8,691$1,960$1,964
2026-02$8,496$1,765$8,691$195$2,342
2026-03$6,321−$2,175$8,691$2,370$3,615
2026-04$6,605$284$8,691$2,086$3,615
2026-05$6,477−$128$8,691$2,214$3,615
2026-06$4,836−$1,641$8,691$3,855$3,918
2026-07$4,867$31$8,691$3,824$4,275
2026-08$8,102$3,235$9,010$908$4,275
2026-09$7,030−$1,072$9,010$1,980$4,275
2026-10$6,157−$873$9,010$2,853$4,275
2026-11$7,587$1,430$9,010$1,423$4,275
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06, refreshed 2026-11-08.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 47% (standard) and 47% (21-Day) of entry fills and 38% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on NEM?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +14.7 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.