Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

GLD 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on GLD, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -3.9 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return15.7%11.8%-3.9 pp
Annualized return7.6%5.8%-1.8 pp
Buy-and-hold return52.0%52.0%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)12.9%14.4%+1.5 pp
Assignment rate30.8%17.1%-13.7 pp
Call-away rate80.0%46.2%-33.8 pp
Average cycle return1.2%0.3%—
Sample cycles1335—
History days728728—
Entry fills1848—
Entry fills priced from real option bars44%50%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—52%—

How GLD compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The GLD total-return delta of -3.9 pp ranks 23rd of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 15.7% against 52.0% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 36.3 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its precious-metals peers AEM, GDX, NEM and SLV, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 1 of 4; GLD itself came in at -3.9 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for GLD shows a put assignment rate of 17.1% and wheel P&L of $4,653 against $13,074 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricGLDFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-3.9 pp-1.4 pp23rd of 37
Rule drawdown delta+1.5 pp-1.3 pp33rd of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return11.8%14.4%21st of 37
21-Day annualized return5.8%7.0%21st of 37
Standard total return15.7%14.7%18th of 37
21-Day max drawdown14.4%20.8%8th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate46.2%39.1%13th of 37
Standard annualized return7.6%7.1%18th of 37
Buy-and-hold return52.0%38.6%12th of 37
Standard max drawdown12.9%24.3%5th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate30.8%30.8%18th of 37
21-Day assignment rate17.1%32.0%33rd of 37
21-Day sample cycles35274th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.3%0.5%24th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
GLD15.7%11.8%-3.9 pp52.0%12.9%14.4%30.8%17.1%
AEM31.3%35.0%+3.8 pp119.9%28.9%28.2%23.1%37.9%
GDX28.9%10.1%-18.8 pp103.3%24.3%26.7%16.7%39.3%
NEM16.2%9.8%-6.4 pp105.8%31.1%31.6%23.1%29.6%
SLV28.3%14.4%-13.9 pp68.1%24.8%29.9%30.0%21.2%

GLD wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

GLD buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 GLD shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-01 ($4,864) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$5,346).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10$224—$623$399$399
2024-11−$568−$792$623$1,191$2,091
2024-12−$914−$346$623$1,537$2,091
2025-01$729$1,643$729$0$2,091
2025-02$1,200$471$2,094$894$2,091
2025-03$3,687$2,487$3,687$0$2,091
2025-04$5,250$1,563$6,432$1,182$2,091
2025-05$5,233−$17$6,432$1,199$2,243
2025-06$5,356$123$6,502$1,146$2,243
2025-07$5,169−$187$6,502$1,333$2,243
2025-08$6,680$1,511$6,680$0$2,243
2025-09$10,420$3,740$10,420$0$2,243
2025-10$11,685$1,265$15,188$3,503$4,015
2025-11$13,661$1,976$15,188$1,527$4,083
2025-12$14,504$843$16,547$2,043$4,083
2026-01$19,368$4,864$24,463$5,095$5,095
2026-02$23,248$3,880$24,463$1,215$6,877
2026-03$17,902−$5,346$24,463$6,561$9,526
2026-04$17,239−$663$24,463$7,224$9,526
2026-05$16,585−$654$24,463$7,878$9,526
2026-06$11,711−$4,874$24,463$12,752$12,998
2026-07$12,027$316$24,463$12,436$13,094
2026-08$15,715$3,688$24,463$8,748$13,094
2026-09$12,957−$2,758$24,463$11,506$13,094
2026-10$13,074$117$24,463$11,389$13,094
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 44% (standard) and 50% (21-Day) of entry fills and 52% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on GLD?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -3.9 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.