Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

AEM 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Two paired wheel simulations on AEM, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +12.9 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return32.3%45.3%+12.9 pp
Annualized return15.1%20.6%+5.5 pp
Buy-and-hold return128.5%128.5%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)33.3%32.4%-0.9 pp
Assignment rate13.3%16.7%+3.4 pp
Call-away rate33.3%41.7%+8.4 pp
Average cycle return2.2%1.3%—
Sample cycles1536—
History days728728—
Entry fills1848—
Entry fills priced from real option bars44%46%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—33%—

How AEM compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 21 and behind on 16. The AEM total-return delta of +12.9 pp ranks 6th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is +2.0 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 32.3% against 128.5% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 96.2 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its precious-metals peers GDX, GLD, SLV and WPM, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 4 of 4; AEM itself came in at +12.9 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for AEM shows a put assignment rate of 15.4% and wheel P&L of $3,067 against $10,773 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricAEMFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+12.9 pp+2.0 pp6th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-0.9 pp-0.6 pp17th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return45.3%16.0%3rd of 37
21-Day annualized return20.6%7.7%3rd of 37
Standard total return32.3%15.0%6th of 37
21-Day max drawdown32.4%19.0%32nd of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate41.7%42.1%21st of 37
Standard annualized return15.1%7.2%6th of 37
Buy-and-hold return128.5%26.4%3rd of 37
Standard max drawdown33.3%20.8%29th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate13.3%36.4%35th of 37
21-Day assignment rate16.7%31.8%32nd of 37
21-Day sample cycles36282nd of 37
21-Day average cycle return1.3%0.6%7th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
AEM32.3%45.3%+12.9 pp128.5%33.3%32.4%13.3%16.7%
GDX35.0%39.5%+4.5 pp124.5%36.1%26.5%33.3%35.7%
GLD3.4%11.3%+7.9 pp50.2%16.6%18.9%25.0%15.2%
SLV5.7%16.0%+10.4 pp64.6%35.8%37.8%25.0%31.0%
WPM17.6%36.6%+19.0 pp110.3%43.4%33.6%36.4%18.8%

AEM wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

AEM buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 AEM shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-02 ($6,110) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$4,862).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-11$58—$58$0$785
2024-12−$563−$621$351$914$999
2025-01$910$1,473$1,062$152$999
2025-02$1,244$334$1,697$453$999
2025-03$2,457$1,213$2,457$0$999
2025-04$3,374$917$3,963$589$999
2025-05$3,415$41$3,963$548$1,869
2025-06$3,509$94$4,062$553$1,869
2025-07$4,052$543$4,478$426$1,869
2025-08$6,033$1,981$6,033$0$1,869
2025-09$8,472$2,439$8,472$0$1,869
2025-10$7,697−$775$10,168$2,471$3,035
2025-11$9,059$1,362$10,168$1,109$3,035
2025-12$8,569−$490$10,168$1,599$3,035
2026-01$10,666$2,097$13,915$3,249$3,249
2026-02$16,776$6,110$16,776$0$3,354
2026-03$11,914−$4,862$16,835$4,921$7,306
2026-04$10,437−$1,477$16,835$6,398$7,306
2026-05$9,931−$506$16,835$6,904$7,879
2026-06$7,129−$2,802$16,835$9,706$9,971
2026-07$6,143−$986$16,835$10,692$11,585
2026-08$11,927$5,784$16,835$4,908$11,585
2026-09$9,943−$1,984$16,835$6,892$11,585
2026-10$8,154−$1,789$16,835$8,681$11,585
2026-11$10,773$2,619$16,835$6,062$11,585
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06, refreshed 2026-11-08.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 44% (standard) and 46% (21-Day) of entry fills and 33% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on AEM?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +12.9 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.