Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

SLV 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-25 to 2026-10-23.

Two paired wheel simulations on SLV, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +17.3 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return-4.3%13.0%+17.3 pp
Annualized return-2.2%6.3%+8.5 pp
Buy-and-hold return59.1%59.1%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)30.3%34.0%+3.8 pp
Assignment rate36.4%33.3%-3.1 pp
Call-away rate42.9%40.0%-2.9 pp
Average cycle return-0.4%0.5%—
Sample cycles1127—
History days728728—
Entry fills1847—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%49%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—47%—

How SLV compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 16 and behind on 21. The SLV total-return delta of +17.3 pp ranks 5th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -0.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned -4.3% against 59.1% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 63.4 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its precious-metals peers AEM, GDX, NEM and WPM, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 3 of 4; SLV itself came in at +17.3 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for SLV shows a put assignment rate of 37.9% and wheel P&L of $1,211 against $1,809 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricSLVFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+17.3 pp-0.4 pp5th of 37
Rule drawdown delta+3.8 pp-1.7 pp36th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return13.0%16.8%25th of 37
21-Day annualized return6.3%8.1%25th of 37
Standard total return-4.3%19.6%35th of 37
21-Day max drawdown34.0%19.0%35th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate40.0%42.1%20th of 37
Standard annualized return-2.2%9.4%35th of 37
Buy-and-hold return59.1%42.2%9th of 37
Standard max drawdown30.3%20.2%28th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate36.4%33.3%16th of 37
21-Day assignment rate33.3%31.0%12th of 37
21-Day sample cycles272821st of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.5%0.6%23rd of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
SLV-4.3%13.0%+17.3 pp59.1%30.3%34.0%36.4%33.3%
AEM21.4%25.0%+3.6 pp100.2%38.5%31.9%30.8%17.6%
GDX6.6%16.5%+10.0 pp93.0%33.6%29.5%33.3%37.0%
NEM31.6%19.4%-12.2 pp124.8%35.2%33.2%30.8%26.9%
WPM2.0%45.4%+43.4 pp82.8%41.4%29.8%50.0%16.7%

SLV wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

SLV buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 SLV shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2025-12 ($1,321) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$1,685).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$82—$76$158$158
2024-11−$271−$189$76$347$394
2024-12−$430−$159$76$506$506
2025-01−$212$218$76$288$506
2025-02−$232−$20$76$308$506
2025-03$36$268$76$40$506
2025-04−$103−$139$76$179$506
2025-05−$63$40$76$139$506
2025-06$218$281$311$93$506
2025-07$269$51$509$240$506
2025-08$556$287$556$0$506
2025-09$1,174$618$1,187$13$506
2025-10$1,338$164$1,854$516$677
2025-11$2,058$720$2,058$0$677
2025-12$3,379$1,321$4,049$670$677
2026-01$4,481$1,102$7,497$3,016$3,016
2026-02$5,436$955$7,497$2,061$3,923
2026-03$3,751−$1,685$7,497$3,746$4,483
2026-04$3,603−$148$7,497$3,894$4,483
2026-05$3,770$167$7,497$3,727$4,483
2026-06$2,284−$1,486$7,497$5,213$5,382
2026-07$2,173−$111$7,497$5,324$5,521
2026-08$2,950$777$7,497$4,547$5,521
2026-09$2,388−$562$7,497$5,109$5,521
2026-10$1,809−$579$7,497$5,688$5,688
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-25 to 2026-10-23, refreshed 2026-10-25.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 49% (21-Day) of entry fills and 47% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on SLV?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +17.3 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.