Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

GOOGL 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on GOOGL, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +14.3 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return21.0%35.2%+14.3 pp
Annualized return10.0%16.3%+6.3 pp
Buy-and-hold return108.4%108.4%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)24.7%21.6%-3.1 pp
Assignment rate21.4%23.3%+1.9 pp
Call-away rate40.0%33.3%-6.7 pp
Average cycle return1.5%1.2%—
Sample cycles1430—
History days728728—
Entry fills1948—
Entry fills priced from real option bars53%50%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—52%—

How GOOGL compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The GOOGL total-return delta of +14.3 pp ranks 7th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 21.0% against 108.4% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 87.4 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AMD, AVGO, META and TSLA, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 4; GOOGL itself came in at +14.3 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for GOOGL shows a put assignment rate of 31.0% and wheel P&L of $10,617 against $17,717 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricGOOGLFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+14.3 pp-1.4 pp7th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-3.1 pp-1.3 pp16th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return35.2%14.4%5th of 37
21-Day annualized return16.3%7.0%5th of 37
Standard total return21.0%14.7%13th of 37
21-Day max drawdown21.6%20.8%20th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate33.3%39.1%29th of 37
Standard annualized return10.0%7.1%13th of 37
Buy-and-hold return108.4%38.6%4th of 37
Standard max drawdown24.7%24.3%21st of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate21.4%30.8%30th of 37
21-Day assignment rate23.3%32.0%26th of 37
21-Day sample cycles302710th of 37
21-Day average cycle return1.2%0.5%6th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
GOOGL21.0%35.2%+14.3 pp108.4%24.7%21.6%21.4%23.3%
AMD38.0%55.9%+17.8 pp239.0%35.5%36.1%57.1%37.5%
AVGO37.6%25.1%-12.5 pp82.8%45.1%24.7%33.3%41.7%
META34.4%21.7%-12.7 pp23.0%30.8%20.8%60.0%41.7%
TSLA35.7%39.5%+3.8 pp60.7%38.2%32.8%23.1%32.0%

GOOGL wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

GOOGL buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 GOOGL shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-04 ($9,724) and the worst was 2025-02 (−$3,374).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10$769—$1,104$335$335
2024-11$553−$216$1,820$1,267$1,686
2024-12$2,588$2,035$3,324$736$1,686
2025-01$4,060$1,472$4,060$0$1,686
2025-02$686−$3,374$4,296$3,610$3,788
2025-03−$878−$1,564$4,296$5,174$5,205
2025-04−$462$416$4,296$4,758$6,168
2025-05$832$1,294$4,296$3,464$6,168
2025-06$1,281$449$4,296$3,015$6,168
2025-07$2,848$1,567$4,296$1,448$6,168
2025-08$4,949$2,101$4,949$0$6,168
2025-09$7,968$3,019$9,130$1,162$6,168
2025-10$11,777$3,809$11,806$29$6,168
2025-11$15,676$3,899$16,002$326$6,168
2025-12$14,958−$718$16,002$1,044$6,168
2026-01$17,458$2,500$17,483$25$6,168
2026-02$14,834−$2,624$18,027$3,193$6,168
2026-03$12,414−$2,420$18,027$5,613$7,019
2026-04$22,138$9,724$22,138$0$7,019
2026-05$21,692−$446$23,920$2,228$7,019
2026-06$19,395−$2,297$23,920$4,525$7,019
2026-07$19,271−$124$23,920$4,649$8,493
2026-08$17,593−$1,678$23,920$6,327$8,493
2026-09$18,066$473$23,920$5,854$8,493
2026-10$17,717−$349$23,920$6,203$8,493
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 53% (standard) and 50% (21-Day) of entry fills and 52% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on GOOGL?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +14.3 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.