Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

META 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on META, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -12.7 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return34.4%21.7%-12.7 pp
Annualized return16.0%10.3%-5.6 pp
Buy-and-hold return23.0%23.0%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)30.8%20.8%-10.1 pp
Assignment rate60.0%41.7%-18.3 pp
Call-away rate71.4%37.5%-33.9 pp
Average cycle return3.4%0.9%—
Sample cycles1024—
History days728728—
Entry fills1748—
Entry fills priced from real option bars47%50%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—50%—

How META compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The META total-return delta of -12.7 pp ranks 30th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 34.4% against 23.0% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel beat holding the shares by 11.3 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AMD, AVGO, ORCL and TSLA, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 3 of 4; META itself came in at -12.7 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for META shows a put assignment rate of 33.3% and wheel P&L of $1,588 against $13,285 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricMETAFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-12.7 pp-1.4 pp30th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-10.1 pp-1.3 pp3rd of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return21.7%14.4%13th of 37
21-Day annualized return10.3%7.0%13th of 37
Standard total return34.4%14.7%7th of 37
21-Day max drawdown20.8%20.8%19th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate37.5%39.1%21st of 37
Standard annualized return16.0%7.1%7th of 37
Buy-and-hold return23.0%38.6%25th of 37
Standard max drawdown30.8%24.3%29th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate60.0%30.8%5th of 37
21-Day assignment rate41.7%32.0%5th of 37
21-Day sample cycles242726th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.9%0.5%11th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
META34.4%21.7%-12.7 pp23.0%30.8%20.8%60.0%41.7%
AMD38.0%55.9%+17.8 pp239.0%35.5%36.1%57.1%37.5%
AVGO37.6%25.1%-12.5 pp82.8%45.1%24.7%33.3%41.7%
ORCL-36.2%-17.3%+18.9 pp-26.6%63.9%51.3%71.4%42.9%
TSLA35.7%39.5%+3.8 pp60.7%38.2%32.8%23.1%32.0%

META wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

META buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 META shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-09 ($15,284) and the worst was 2025-03 (−$9,184).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$889—$1,681$2,570$2,570
2024-11−$215$674$1,681$1,896$3,920
2024-12$904$1,119$5,621$4,717$4,743
2025-01$11,271$10,367$11,271$0$4,743
2025-02$9,173−$2,098$16,020$6,847$7,917
2025-03−$11−$9,184$16,020$16,031$16,031
2025-04−$2,747−$2,736$16,020$18,767$25,201
2025-05$7,102$9,849$16,020$8,918$25,201
2025-06$16,162$9,060$16,162$0$25,201
2025-07$19,697$3,535$19,697$0$25,201
2025-08$16,223−$3,474$21,353$5,130$25,201
2025-09$15,791−$432$21,353$5,562$25,201
2025-10$7,188−$8,603$21,353$14,165$25,201
2025-11$7,148−$40$21,353$14,205$25,201
2025-12$8,362$1,214$21,353$12,991$25,201
2026-01$14,003$5,641$21,353$7,350$25,201
2026-02$7,171−$6,832$21,353$14,182$25,201
2026-03−$434−$7,605$21,353$21,787$26,428
2026-04$3,544$3,978$21,353$17,809$26,428
2026-05$5,604$2,060$21,353$15,749$26,428
2026-06−$1,318−$6,922$21,353$22,671$26,428
2026-07−$1,976−$658$21,353$23,329$26,428
2026-08−$413$1,563$21,353$21,766$26,428
2026-09$14,871$15,284$21,353$6,482$26,428
2026-10$13,285−$1,586$21,353$8,068$26,428
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 47% (standard) and 50% (21-Day) of entry fills and 50% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on META?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -12.7 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.