Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

META wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $53,482 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$53482.32
Total P&L
$-3517.68
Assign %
58.3%
Call-away %
48.1%
Cycles
14
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

Buy & hold finished $5598.68 ahead of the wheel (buy & hold made money while the wheel lost).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$2081.00$-3517.68
Largest drop$26428.00$29610.00

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 14 cycles).

Simulated premium was $53,482. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$57,000. Combined realized P&L was −$3,518.

Puts were assigned on 58.3% of put trades (14 of 24). Calls were assigned away on 48.1% of call trades (13 of 27).

This simulation’s wheel P&L (−$3,518) trailed buy-and-hold P&L ($2,081) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $29,610 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $29,610, from the 2026-01-29 peak to the 2026-11-05 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $26,428 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $26,428, from the 2025-08-12 peak to the 2026-03-27 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 91 of 500 days (18.2%). Its widest lead was $7,202 on 2025-11-06; its widest deficit was −$25,898 on 2026-09-24.

Wheel P&L peaked at $15,100 on 2026-01-29 and bottomed at −$14,510 on 2026-11-05. Buy-and-hold peaked at $20,066 on 2025-08-12 and bottomed at −$10,468 on 2025-04-21.

Of 51 priced entries, 10 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, 27 used historical option bars, and 14 used Black-Scholes fills from realized volatility. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11$1,569—−$1,502$3,071$0$1,502
2024-12$2,145$576−$383$2,528$3,370$4,717
2025-01$8,514$6,369$9,984−$1,470$5,700$0
2025-02$5,441−$3,073$7,886−$2,445$8,773$6,847
2025-03−$1,259−$6,700−$1,298$39$15,473$16,031
2025-04−$2,992−$1,733−$4,034$1,042$17,206$18,767
2025-05−$1,001$1,990$5,815−$6,816$15,215$8,918
2025-06$5,822$6,823$14,875−$9,053$8,392$0
2025-07$12,610$6,788$18,410−$5,800$1,604$0
2025-08$5,402−$7,207$14,936−$9,534$8,812$5,130
2025-09$7,675$2,273$14,504−$6,829$6,539$5,562
2025-10$10,162$2,487$5,901$4,261$4,052$14,165
2025-11$3,317−$6,845$5,861−$2,544$10,897$14,205
2025-12$2,404−$913$7,075−$4,671$11,810$12,991
2026-01$2,769$365$12,716−$9,947$12,331$7,350
2026-02$292−$2,477$5,884−$5,592$14,808$14,182
2026-03−$4,278−$4,570−$1,721−$2,557$19,378$21,787
2026-04−$4,199$79$2,257−$6,456$19,299$17,809
2026-05−$7,654−$3,455$4,317−$11,971$22,754$15,749
2026-06−$9,055−$1,401−$2,605−$6,450$24,155$22,671
2026-07−$12,703−$3,648−$3,263−$9,440$27,803$23,329
2026-08−$9,093$3,610−$1,700−$7,393$24,193$21,766
2026-09−$7,073$2,020$13,584−$20,657$22,173$6,482
2026-10−$13,519−$6,446$2,565−$16,084$28,619$17,501
2026-11−$14,003−$484$2,081−$16,084$29,103$17,985

Cash-secured puts

Trades
24
Assignments
14 (58.3%)
Simulated premium
$23,779
Avg premium
$991

Covered calls

Trades
27
Called away
13 (48.1%)
Simulated premium
$29,703
Stock / assignment P&L
−$57,000

How META compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. META is not one of them.

Compared with its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AMD, AVGO, ORCL and TSLA, META sits above the peer median put assignment rate of 40.8%. 3 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, while META did not.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for META uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished -16.2 pp behind holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricMETAFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate58.3%31.0%1st of 45
Simulated premium$53,482$10,1283rd of 45
Wheel P&L−$3,518$2,82843rd of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$2,081$3,90129th of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold−$5,599−$49541st of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
META58.3%$53,482−$3,518$2,081Wheel behind
AMD25.9%$40,866$21,116$30,109Wheel behind
AVGO35.7%$41,127$25,877$11,005Wheel ahead
ORCL50.0%$25,322−$5,678−$7,315Wheel ahead
TSLA45.8%$54,804$14,304$3,700Wheel ahead

META 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 10 IV / 27 bar / 14 HV

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did META collect this premium?

No. The $53,482 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.