Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

MSFT 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16.

Two paired wheel simulations on MSFT, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -8.6 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return12.0%3.4%-8.6 pp
Annualized return5.9%1.7%-4.2 pp
Buy-and-hold return26.5%26.5%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)24.7%19.5%-5.1 pp
Assignment rate33.3%23.1%-10.2 pp
Call-away rate37.5%27.3%-10.2 pp
Average cycle return1.3%0.1%—
Sample cycles926—
History days728728—
Entry fills1748—
Entry fills priced from real option bars47%50%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—52%—

How MSFT compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 18 and behind on 19. The MSFT total-return delta of -8.6 pp ranks 27th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is -1.4 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 12.0% against 26.5% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 14.5 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AMZN, GOOGL, META and NVDA, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 4; MSFT itself came in at -8.6 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for MSFT shows a put assignment rate of 30.3% and wheel P&L of $4,976 against $11,089 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricMSFTFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta-8.6 pp-1.4 pp27th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-5.1 pp-1.3 pp9th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return3.4%14.4%30th of 37
21-Day annualized return1.7%7.0%30th of 37
Standard total return12.0%14.7%23rd of 37
21-Day max drawdown19.5%20.8%15th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate27.3%39.1%32nd of 37
Standard annualized return5.9%7.1%23rd of 37
Buy-and-hold return26.5%38.6%24th of 37
Standard max drawdown24.7%24.3%20th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate33.3%30.8%15th of 37
21-Day assignment rate23.1%32.0%27th of 37
21-Day sample cycles262720th of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.1%0.5%33rd of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
MSFT12.0%3.4%-8.6 pp26.5%24.7%19.5%33.3%23.1%
AMZN3.0%8.8%+5.8 pp32.3%24.1%20.6%41.7%36.4%
GOOGL21.0%35.2%+14.3 pp108.4%24.7%21.6%21.4%23.3%
META34.4%21.7%-12.7 pp23.0%30.8%20.8%60.0%41.7%
NVDA60.9%22.1%-38.8 pp55.2%28.2%27.6%25.0%46.2%

MSFT wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

MSFT buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 MSFT shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-07 ($9,170) and the worst was 2026-06 (−$7,722).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-10−$1,181—$1,437$2,618$2,618
2024-11$530$1,711$1,437$907$2,618
2024-12$334−$196$3,630$3,296$3,296
2025-01−$310−$644$3,630$3,940$3,947
2025-02−$2,117−$1,807$3,630$5,747$6,193
2025-03−$4,277−$2,160$3,630$7,907$7,907
2025-04−$2,290$1,987$3,630$5,920$9,990
2025-05$4,220$6,510$4,253$33$9,990
2025-06$7,925$3,705$7,929$4$9,990
2025-07$11,534$3,609$11,534$0$9,990
2025-08$8,853−$2,681$11,748$2,895$9,990
2025-09$9,979$1,126$11,748$1,769$9,990
2025-10$9,965−$14$12,391$2,426$9,990
2025-11$7,385−$2,580$12,391$5,006$9,990
2025-12$6,546−$839$12,391$5,845$9,990
2026-01$1,213−$5,333$12,391$11,178$11,178
2026-02−$2,542−$3,755$12,391$14,933$15,760
2026-03−$4,799−$2,257$12,391$17,190$18,530
2026-04−$1,038$3,761$12,391$13,429$18,530
2026-05$3,208$4,246$12,391$9,183$18,530
2026-06−$4,514−$7,722$12,391$16,905$18,924
2026-07$4,656$9,170$12,391$7,735$18,924
2026-08$8,913$4,257$12,391$3,478$18,924
2026-09$9,474$561$12,391$2,917$18,924
2026-10$11,089$1,615$12,529$1,440$18,924
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-10-18 to 2026-10-16, refreshed 2026-10-18.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 47% (standard) and 50% (21-Day) of entry fills and 52% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on MSFT?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished -8.6 pp behind holding to expiry — managing early hurt here.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.