Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

PG wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $5,811 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$5811.49
Total P&L
$1311.49
Assign %
40.0%
Call-away %
25.8%
Cycles
8
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

The wheel finished $1542.49 ahead of buy & hold (wheel made money while buy & hold lost).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$-231.00$1311.49
Largest drop$4166.00$2190.59

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 8 cycles).

Simulated premium was $5,811. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$4,500. Combined realized P&L was $1,311.

Puts were assigned on 40.0% of put trades (8 of 20). Calls were assigned away on 25.8% of call trades (8 of 31).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($1,311) beat buy-and-hold P&L (−$231) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $2,191 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $2,191, from the 2025-02-25 peak to the 2026-04-07 trough, and got back to that peak on 2026-09-22. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $4,166 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $4,166, from the 2024-12-02 peak to the 2026-01-07 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 438 of 500 days (87.6%). Its widest lead was $2,898 on 2026-10-05; its widest deficit was −$1,048 on 2024-12-02.

Wheel P&L peaked at $1,835 on 2026-10-15 and bottomed at −$1,432 on 2026-04-07. Buy-and-hold peaked at $1,199 on 2024-12-02 and bottomed at −$2,967 on 2026-01-07.

Of 51 priced entries, 9 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, 27 used historical option bars, and 15 used Black-Scholes fills from realized volatility. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11$151—$1,155−$1,004$0$10
2024-12$20−$132−$6$26$251$1,205
2025-01−$151−$171−$172$21$466$1,371
2025-02$244$395$613−$369$515$586
2025-03$265$21$271−$6$494$928
2025-04−$325−$590−$514$189$1,084$1,713
2025-05$90$416$218−$128$669$981
2025-06−$237−$327−$839$602$996$2,038
2025-07−$773−$536−$1,724$951$1,532$2,923
2025-08$82$855−$1,067$1,149$677$2,266
2025-09−$19−$101−$1,406$1,387$778$2,605
2025-10−$83−$64−$1,734$1,651$842$2,933
2025-11$87$170−$1,955$2,042$672$3,154
2025-12−$221−$308−$2,440$2,219$980$3,639
2026-01$426$647−$1,594$2,020$333$2,793
2026-02$739$313−$51$790$20$1,250
2026-03−$1,118−$1,857−$2,327$1,209$1,877$3,526
2026-04−$673$445−$2,062$1,389$1,432$3,261
2026-05−$737−$64−$2,415$1,678$1,496$3,614
2026-06−$228$509−$2,107$1,879$987$3,306
2026-07$192$420−$2,322$2,514$567$3,521
2026-08$456$264−$2,259$2,715$303$3,458
2026-09$595$139−$2,243$2,838$375$3,442
2026-10$1,311$716−$614$1,925$524$1,813
2026-11$1,311$0−$231$1,542$524$1,430

Cash-secured puts

Trades
20
Assignments
8 (40.0%)
Simulated premium
$2,850
Avg premium
$142

Covered calls

Trades
31
Called away
8 (25.8%)
Simulated premium
$2,962
Stock / assignment P&L
−$4,500

How PG compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. PG is one of them.

Simulated premium equals 443.1% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its defensive, healthcare and income peers COST, WMT, XLP and XLU, PG sits above the peer median put assignment rate of 31.6%. 2 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, as did PG.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for PG uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished +8.3 pp ahead of holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricPGFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate40.0%31.0%8th of 45
Simulated premium$5,811$10,12831st of 45
Wheel P&L$1,311$2,82832nd of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L−$231$3,90141st of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold$1,542−$4958th of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
PG40.0%$5,811$1,311−$231Wheel ahead
COST36.8%$38,434$17,934$10,976Wheel ahead
WMT34.6%$5,828$3,328$4,069Wheel behind
XLP28.6%$1,671$421$926Wheel behind
XLU20.0%$1,583$683$354Wheel ahead

PG 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 9 IV / 27 bar / 15 HV

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did PG collect this premium?

No. The $5,811 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.