Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

COST wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $38,434 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$38433.62
Total P&L
$17933.62
Assign %
36.8%
Call-away %
21.9%
Cycles
7
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

The wheel finished $6957.62 ahead of buy & hold (earned more: $17933.62 vs $10976.00).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$10976.00$17933.62
Largest drop$22686.00$15912.56

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 7 cycles).

Simulated premium was $38,434. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$20,500. Combined realized P&L was $17,934.

Puts were assigned on 36.8% of put trades (7 of 19). Calls were assigned away on 21.9% of call trades (7 of 32).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($17,934) beat buy-and-hold P&L ($10,976) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $15,913 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $15,913, from the 2024-12-06 peak to the 2025-03-13 trough, and got back to that peak on 2025-06-06. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $22,686 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $22,686, from the 2025-02-13 peak to the 2025-12-22 trough, and got back to that peak on 2026-05-19.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 330 of 500 days (66.0%). Its widest lead was $19,513 on 2026-09-25; its widest deficit was −$12,561 on 2025-02-13.

Wheel P&L peaked at $20,570 on 2026-08-24 and bottomed at −$13,866 on 2025-03-13. Buy-and-hold peaked at $15,052 on 2026-05-19 and bottomed at −$9,380 on 2025-12-22.

Of 51 priced entries, 7 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, 27 used historical option bars, and 17 used Black-Scholes fills from realized volatility. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11$1,304—$2,808−$1,504$0$0
2024-12−$3,294−$4,598−$2,753−$541$5,340$7,842
2025-01$745$4,039$3,608−$2,863$1,301$1,481
2025-02$1,297$552$10,481−$9,184$749$2,825
2025-03−$7,116−$8,414$198−$7,314$9,163$13,108
2025-04−$803$6,313$5,070−$5,873$2,850$8,236
2025-05$1,284$2,088$9,638−$8,354$762$3,668
2025-06$2,479$1,194$4,614−$2,135$1,454$8,692
2025-07−$1,140−$3,619−$416−$724$5,073$13,722
2025-08$351$1,492−$48$399$5,125$13,354
2025-09$2,293$1,941−$1,817$4,110$3,184$15,123
2025-10$2,013−$280−$3,235$5,248$3,828$16,541
2025-11$3,447$1,434−$3,021$6,468$2,394$16,327
2025-12$72−$3,375−$8,146$8,218$5,769$21,452
2026-01$4,122$4,050−$355$4,477$5,961$13,661
2026-02$12,280$8,158$6,699$5,581$0$6,607
2026-03$15,122$2,842$5,263$9,859$15$8,043
2026-04$17,029$1,907$7,073$9,956$1,653$6,233
2026-05$19,464$2,435$1,252$18,212$0$13,800
2026-06$13,881−$5,583−$833$14,714$5,583$15,885
2026-07$17,174$3,293$809$16,365$2,290$14,243
2026-08$17,819$645$9$17,810$2,751$15,043
2026-09$16,167−$1,652−$3,346$19,513$4,403$18,398
2026-10$17,934$1,767$6,848$11,086$2,636$8,204
2026-11$17,934$0$10,976$6,958$2,636$4,076

Cash-secured puts

Trades
19
Assignments
7 (36.8%)
Simulated premium
$15,826
Avg premium
$833

Covered calls

Trades
32
Called away
7 (21.9%)
Simulated premium
$22,608
Stock / assignment P&L
−$20,500

How COST compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. COST is one of them.

Simulated premium equals 214.3% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its defensive, healthcare and income peers LLY, UNH, XLP and XLU, COST sits above the peer median put assignment rate of 29.8%. 1 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, as did COST.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for COST uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished +4.0 pp ahead of holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricCOSTFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate36.8%31.0%11th of 45
Simulated premium$38,434$10,1287th of 45
Wheel P&L$17,934$2,8285th of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$10,976$3,9019th of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold$6,958−$4954th of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
COST36.8%$38,434$17,934$10,976Wheel ahead
LLY31.0%$79,237$19,237$52,246Wheel behind
UNH32.1%$32,256−$25,244−$22,166Wheel behind
XLP28.6%$1,671$421$926Wheel behind
XLU20.0%$1,583$683$354Wheel ahead

COST 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 7 IV / 27 bar / 17 HV

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did COST collect this premium?

No. The $38,434 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.