Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

XLV 21-Day Rule research

Public recipe: cash-secured wheel sized to equity, 35 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, manage at 21 DTE. Simulated window 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Two paired wheel simulations on XLV, one managed at 21 DTE. On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +4.1 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Arm-by-arm comparison

MetricStandard (hold to expiry)21-Day RuleDelta
Total return5.7%9.8%+4.1 pp
Annualized return2.8%4.8%+2.0 pp
Buy-and-hold return23.1%23.1%0.0 pp
Max drawdown (from peak equity)13.0%10.2%-2.7 pp
Assignment rate23.1%38.1%+15.0 pp
Call-away rate60.0%33.3%-26.7 pp
Average cycle return0.4%0.5%—
Sample cycles1321—
History days728728—
Entry fills1845—
Entry fills priced from real option bars50%47%—
21-DTE buy-backs priced from real option bars—36%—

How XLV compares

Across the 37 published tickers, the 21-Day Rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 21 and behind on 16. The XLV total-return delta of +4.1 pp ranks 16th of 37 (1st is where managing early helped most); the median delta is +2.0 pp.

Without the rule, the standard arm returned 5.7% against 23.1% for buy-and-hold, so the plain wheel trailed holding the shares by 17.4 percentage points in this simulation.

Among its defensive, healthcare and income peers HYG, KO, PG and TLT, the rule finished ahead of holding to expiry on 2 of 4; XLV itself came in at +4.1 pp.

The separate 10 DTE / 2% OTM wheel snapshot for XLV shows a put assignment rate of 26.1% and wheel P&L of $2,029 against $3,462 for buy-and-hold. That is a different recipe from the 35 DTE study on this page, so the two results are not additive.

MetricXLVFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Rule total-return delta+4.1 pp+2.0 pp16th of 37
Rule drawdown delta-2.7 pp-0.6 pp14th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day total return9.8%16.0%29th of 37
21-Day annualized return4.8%7.7%29th of 37
Standard total return5.7%15.0%27th of 37
21-Day max drawdown10.2%19.0%5th of 37 (lowest first)
21-Day call-away rate33.3%42.1%26th of 37
Standard annualized return2.8%7.2%27th of 37
Buy-and-hold return23.1%26.4%22nd of 37
Standard max drawdown13.0%20.8%8th of 37 (lowest first)
Standard assignment rate23.1%36.4%29th of 37
21-Day assignment rate38.1%31.8%8th of 37
21-Day sample cycles212833rd of 37
21-Day average cycle return0.5%0.6%24th of 37
TickerStandard return21-Day returnRule deltaBuy-and-holdStandard drawdown21-Day drawdownStandard assignment21-Day assignment
XLV5.7%9.8%+4.1 pp23.1%13.0%10.2%23.1%38.1%
HYG0.5%1.4%+0.9 pp-3.2%3.9%4.1%7.1%11.4%
KO28.9%26.1%-2.8 pp49.7%11.2%7.5%28.6%26.9%
PG9.0%17.3%+8.3 pp-1.4%12.4%8.6%75.0%42.1%
TLT5.9%-2.3%-8.2 pp-11.4%12.0%11.4%60.0%23.8%

XLV wheel snapshot — the other published study on this ticker.

XLV buy-and-hold path

Month-end P&L of holding 100 XLV shares over the same window as this study, taken from the stored series of the 10 DTE wheel snapshot. The best month for holders was 2026-10 ($1,645) and the worst was 2026-03 (−$1,359).

MonthBuy-and-hold P&LChange in monthRunning highBelow its peakWorst fall so far
2024-11−$277—$0$277$897
2024-12−$1,261−$984$0$1,261$1,390
2025-01−$331$930$0$331$1,390
2025-02−$125$206$0$125$1,390
2025-03−$417−$292$0$417$1,390
2025-04−$971−$554$0$971$1,761
2025-05−$1,754−$783$0$1,754$2,141
2025-06−$1,539$215$0$1,539$2,141
2025-07−$1,975−$436$0$1,975$2,141
2025-08−$1,275$700$0$1,275$2,141
2025-09−$1,101$174$0$1,101$2,141
2025-10−$593$508$0$593$2,141
2025-11$747$1,340$859$112$2,141
2025-12$462−$285$859$397$2,141
2026-01$456−$6$948$492$2,141
2026-02$1,002$546$1,002$0$2,141
2026-03−$357−$1,359$1,002$1,359$2,141
2026-04−$419−$62$1,002$1,421$2,141
2026-05−$71$348$1,002$1,073$2,141
2026-06$848$919$1,056$208$2,141
2026-07$1,237$389$1,708$471$2,141
2026-08$2,036$799$2,550$514$2,141
2026-09$1,824−$212$2,550$726$2,141
2026-10$3,469$1,645$3,469$0$2,141
2026-11$3,462−$7$3,948$486$2,141
Problem

A single ticker result is context, not a verdict

One ticker and one window prove nothing general; the rule arm sometimes cannot exit at 21 DTE

Solution

What this paired simulation produced

Window and freshness

Period 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06, refreshed 2026-11-08.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.
  • Simulated results of one fixed recipe over one historical window; not collected income and not a prediction.
  • The rule arm could not exit at 21 DTE on 0 short options and held those to expiry.
  • Modelled pricing: real option bars priced 50% (standard) and 47% (21-Day) of entry fills and 36% of 21 DTE buy-backs; the rest used implied or realized volatility where market quotes were missing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did the 21-Day Rule help on XLV?

On this simulation the 21-Day Rule finished +4.1 pp ahead of holding to expiry.

What recipe was simulated?

Same wheel, but the 21-Day arm buys each short option back at 21 DTE; an in-the-money put then takes the shares at that day's close and an in-the-money call delivers them.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.