Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

NVDA wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $18,215 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$18215.49
Total P&L
$9215.49
Assign %
33.3%
Call-away %
55.6%
Cycles
11
Trades
51

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

The wheel finished $5314.49 ahead of buy & hold (earned more: $9215.49 vs $3901.00).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$3901.00$9215.49
Largest drop$5764.00$5380.42

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (51 trades, 11 cycles).

Simulated premium was $18,215. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$9,000. Combined realized P&L was $9,215.

Puts were assigned on 33.3% of put trades (11 of 33). Calls were assigned away on 55.6% of call trades (10 of 18).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($9,215) beat buy-and-hold P&L ($3,901) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $5,380 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $5,380, from the 2025-01-23 peak to the 2025-04-04 trough, and got back to that peak on 2025-10-24. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $5,764 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $5,764, from the 2026-10-06 peak to the 2026-11-05 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 320 of 500 days (64.0%). Its widest lead was $3,159 on 2026-07-29; its widest deficit was −$3,836 on 2025-10-29.

Wheel P&L peaked at $9,138 on 2026-09-03 and bottomed at −$3,604 on 2025-04-04. Buy-and-hold peaked at $9,161 on 2026-10-06 and bottomed at −$5,332 on 2025-04-04.

Of 51 priced entries, 24 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, and 27 used historical option bars. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11−$73—−$938$865$335$1,004
2024-12$289$362−$1,334$1,623$593$1,400
2025-01−$939−$1,228−$2,756$1,817$2,715$2,936
2025-02−$1,505−$566−$2,271$766$3,281$2,451
2025-03−$2,197−$692−$3,925$1,728$3,973$4,105
2025-04−$1,670$527−$3,871$2,201$3,446$4,051
2025-05−$1,041$629−$1,250$209$2,817$1,430
2025-06−$751$290$1,036−$1,787$2,527$0
2025-07−$150$602$3,024−$3,174$1,926$140
2025-08$255$404$2,655−$2,400$1,521$898
2025-09$1,183$929$3,895−$2,712$593$0
2025-10$2,105$922$5,486−$3,381$0$455
2025-11$2,448$343$2,937−$489$555$3,004
2025-12$3,944$1,496$3,887$57$403$2,054
2026-01$5,184$1,240$4,350$834$0$1,591
2026-02$4,756−$428$2,956$1,800$1,837$2,985
2026-03$5,617$861$2,677$2,940$976$3,264
2026-04$5,643$26$5,194$449$950$1,704
2026-05$6,658$1,015$6,351$307$0$2,460
2026-06$6,444−$214$5,246$1,198$949$3,565
2026-07$7,397$953$5,312$2,085$0$3,499
2026-08$8,371$974$7,315$1,056$720$1,496
2026-09$8,482$111$8,075$407$656$736
2026-10$6,679−$1,803$5,701$978$2,459$3,460
2026-11$4,879−$1,800$3,901$978$4,259$5,260

Cash-secured puts

Trades
33
Assignments
11 (33.3%)
Simulated premium
$11,812
Avg premium
$358

Covered calls

Trades
18
Called away
10 (55.6%)
Simulated premium
$6,404
Stock / assignment P&L
−$9,000

How NVDA compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. NVDA is one of them.

Simulated premium equals 197.7% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its mega-cap tech and semiconductor peers AMZN, GOOGL, META and TSLA, NVDA sits below the peer median put assignment rate of 44.9%. 2 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, as did NVDA.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for NVDA uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished +2.0 pp ahead of holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricNVDAFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate33.3%31.0%18th of 45
Simulated premium$18,215$10,12814th of 45
Wheel P&L$9,215$2,82810th of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$3,901$3,90123rd of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold$5,314−$4955th of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
NVDA33.3%$18,215$9,215$3,901Wheel ahead
AMZN44.0%$17,497$6,497$5,112Wheel ahead
GOOGL34.5%$19,771$6,271$10,643Wheel behind
META58.3%$53,482−$3,518$2,081Wheel behind
TSLA45.8%$54,804$14,304$3,700Wheel ahead

NVDA 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 24 IV / 27 bar

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did NVDA collect this premium?

No. The $18,215 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.