Days to Expiry — Options Portfolio Tracker logo
Days to Expiry

WPM wheel backtest snapshot

Public recipe: 10 DTE / 2% OTM puts and calls, ~2-year simulated window.

Simulated, not collected: this run produced $11,256 in premium over 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.

Premium
$11256.22
Total P&L
$2756.22
Assign %
21.9%
Call-away %
43.8%
Cycles
7
Trades
48

Buy & hold vs the wheel

Nov 8, 2024 – Nov 6, 2026

Buy & hold finished $4392.78 ahead of the wheel (earned more: $7149.00 vs $2756.22).

Buy & hold
Buy 100 shares and hold
Wheel strategy
Puts → calls · keep premiums as cash
Profit or loss$7149.00$2756.22
Largest drop$6227.00$4460.00

Try this ticker in the backtest

This page is one fixed recipe (10 DTE / 2% OTM). The interactive tool lets you change DTE, OTM, or dates.

Why this result

This simulation ran 2024-11-08 to 2026-11-06 (48 trades, 7 cycles).

Simulated premium was $11,256. Simulated stock / assignment P&L was −$8,500. Combined realized P&L was $2,756.

Puts were assigned on 21.9% of put trades (7 of 32). Calls were assigned away on 43.8% of call trades (7 of 16).

This simulation’s wheel P&L ($2,756) trailed buy-and-hold P&L ($7,149) on the stored window.

Wheel drawdown was $4,460 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $4,460, from the 2026-03-10 peak to the 2026-10-30 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window. Buy-and-hold drawdown was $6,227 on the engine's stored basis; measured as the deepest fall from a P&L peak on the daily P&L series it was $6,227, from the 2026-03-02 peak to the 2026-07-20 trough, and had not got back to that peak by the end of the window.

On the stored daily series the wheel was ahead of buy-and-hold on 58 of 500 days (11.6%). Its widest lead was $840 on 2025-01-13; its widest deficit was −$6,669 on 2026-08-25.

Wheel P&L peaked at $5,374 on 2026-03-10 and bottomed at −$300 on 2024-12-19. Buy-and-hold peaked at $10,090 on 2026-03-02 and bottomed at −$907 on 2025-01-13.

Of 48 priced entries, 6 used Black-Scholes fills from implied volatility, 24 used historical option bars, and 18 used Black-Scholes fills from realized volatility. The engine flagged this run as using modeled fills.

Month by month

MonthWheel P&LWheel change in monthBuy-and-hold P&LWheel minus holdWheel below peakHold below peak
2024-11$141—−$249$390$0$249
2024-12−$250−$391−$858$608$665$858
2025-01$105$355−$235$340$310$235
2025-02$257$152$410−$153$158$134
2025-03$452$195$1,281−$829$0$0
2025-04$678$226$1,870−$1,192$0$162
2025-05$992$315$2,193−$1,201$0$0
2025-06$1,306$314$2,498−$1,192$0$295
2025-07$1,683$377$2,669−$986$0$421
2025-08$1,977$294$3,560−$1,583$0$27
2025-09$2,351$374$4,702−$2,351$0$0
2025-10$1,653−$698$3,170−$1,517$1,556$1,698
2025-11$3,367$1,714$4,523−$1,156$0$345
2025-12$3,562$195$5,270−$1,708$0$670
2026-01$4,343$781$6,705−$2,362$0$2,443
2026-02$5,014$671$9,883−$4,869$0$0
2026-03$3,742−$1,272$6,619−$2,877$1,632$3,471
2026-04$3,541−$201$6,164−$2,623$1,833$3,926
2026-05$3,831$290$6,778−$2,947$1,543$3,312
2026-06$2,255−$1,576$4,750−$2,495$3,119$5,340
2026-07$2,720$465$4,421−$1,701$2,654$5,669
2026-08$3,221$501$8,601−$5,380$2,153$1,489
2026-09$1,903−$1,318$6,890−$4,987$3,471$3,200
2026-10$914−$989$5,176−$4,262$4,460$4,914
2026-11$2,756$1,842$7,149−$4,393$2,618$2,941

Cash-secured puts

Trades
32
Assignments
7 (21.9%)
Simulated premium
$6,923
Avg premium
$216

Covered calls

Trades
16
Called away
7 (43.8%)
Simulated premium
$4,333
Stock / assignment P&L
−$8,500

How WPM compares

18 of 45 snapshots show simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold over their windows. WPM is not one of them.

Simulated premium equals 408.4% of the combined wheel P&L here; the median across snapshots with positive wheel P&L is 238.8%.

Compared with its precious-metals peers GDX, GLD, NEM and SLV, WPM sits below the peer median put assignment rate of 33.9%. 0 of those 4 peers had simulated wheel P&L above buy-and-hold, while WPM did not.

The separate 21-Day Rule study for WPM uses a longer 35 DTE recipe, so it is not additive to this snapshot. On that study the managed arm finished +19.0 pp ahead of holding to expiry, against a median of +2.0 pp across tickers.

MetricWPMFamily medianRank (highest first unless noted)
Put assignment rate21.9%31.0%33rd of 45
Simulated premium$11,256$10,12821st of 45
Wheel P&L$2,756$2,82824th of 45
Buy-and-hold P&L$7,149$3,90116th of 45
Wheel minus buy-and-hold−$4,393−$49538th of 45
TickerPut assignmentPremiumWheel P&LBuy-and-hold P&LOutcome
WPM21.9%$11,256$2,756$7,149Wheel behind
GDX34.5%$7,531$3,931$4,858Wheel behind
GLD21.9%$14,556$11,056$12,456Wheel behind
NEM42.3%$10,128$2,828$7,587Wheel behind
SLV33.3%$6,250$1,500$1,839Wheel behind

WPM 21-Day Rule study — the other published study on this ticker.

Problem

A snapshot is not a custom backtest

One fixed recipe: no price tape, no trade list, and model fills where quotes were missing

Solution

What this simulation produced

Window

Requested 2024-11-08–2026-11-08; actual 2024-11-08–2026-11-06.

Limitations

Premiums may include model fills (BSM/IV) when market quotes were missing.

Pricing sources: 6 IV / 24 bar / 18 HV

  • Simulated public wheel tool: no commissions, fees, or slippage.
  • Assignment and call-away settled on underlying close at expiry (not option mid marks mid-life).
  • Some entry premiums used synthetic BSM pricing (IV or realized vol) rather than historical option bars.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about getting started

Did WPM collect this premium?

No. The $11,256 is simulated premium, not cash collected.

Ready to Get Started?

Join traders who are already using our tools to make better decisions.

Live broker sync, true cost basis after rolls. No card.